Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It looks like how a correct server must be i like very much the feautures and to be honest that time i say the truth other times i say it for advertise and help with good words

.

Why u dont makes the rates opposite

Start from 45 and as they lvl become 25 to be a litle harder and have also a point

Edited by Dante44®
Posted (edited)

The rate ideas, straight from Emineo? Hopefully you find the perfect mix in the rates!

To be honest, from here

When he went to the junk, i saw it..

 

I have not read your rates. Neither features to tell the truth...

I don't deal with this section..

 

 

 

It looks like how a correct server must be i like very much the feautures and to be honest that time i say the truth other times i say it for advertise and help with good words

.

Why u dont makes the rates opposite

Start from 45 and as they lvl become 25 to be a litle harder and have also a point

Thank you mate...

My goal is to will have a little balance. What do i mean?

With +10x, will climb somewhat the same as the previous levels. Without to becomes harder..

Edited by 'Baggos'
Posted (edited)

Please tell me why you guys think l2off would be better in order to make a low-mid server? This was truth back in 2010, back then where there was no aCis...

 

There are no missing IL features on aCis, the only drawback is the skills, they're kinda focked up. But hey, a server should be tested + fixed before launched ;)

 

GL mate, features seem amazing.

Edited by An4rchy
Posted

Please tell me why you guys think l2off would be better in order to make a low-mid server? This was truth back in 2010, back then where there was no aCis...

 

There are no missing IL features on aCis, the only drawback is the skills, they're kinda focked up. But hey, a server should be tested + fixed before launched ;)

 

GL mate, features seem amazing.

Relax... aCis need 1year+ to be like off on skills and etc). as have said they themselves also.

But i do not disagree with you..

Posted

Sorry mate. When i read the replay, i see only this line "Please tell me why you guys think l2off would be better in order to make a low-mid server? This was truth back in 2010, back then where there was no aCis..."

 

Of course and the features are working properly. :p

Tryskell has shed much work on project.

I said for L2OFF only for Skills and some things work better there..

 

 


There are no missing IL features on aCis, the only drawback is the skills, they're kinda focked up. But hey, a server should be tested + fixed before launched ;)

 

GL mate, features seem amazing.

Agreement ..
Besides, each according server, wants its own "edit" balance.

 

Thank you mate...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

just joined here reading about creating servers, as a programmer and lineage player... don't really think x20 server should have x20 drops, x25 spoil and x5 quest reward... its tooooo much. x5 quest reward at stakato will make creating S grade weapons a piece of cake.... etc, etc. Also good work keep going and have fun debugging :)

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Basically now i can just steal your server setup and open it first, don't ask for opinions you ain't gonna make something that will be enjoyable by everybody, also people can easily steal your ideas.

It's easy to steal features, but somehow difficult to steal the gameplay from my mind..

Almost all pvp servers have same features today, but the difference is in how you can build something..

The complete idea stays in your mind, not in others eyes. :)

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..