Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2rwky1t.jpg

L2JTRAPZONE INTERLUDE SERVER

Server Rates

Exp: x50

Sp: x50

Drop adena: x100

 

 

Enchant Rates

Safe Enchant: +3

Max Enchant Armor: +10

Max Enchant Weapon: +16 

Normal Enchantment Scroll: 70%

Crystal Enchantment Scroll: 100%

Blessed Enchantment Scroll: 85%

Top Life Stone Rate : 10% 

High Life Stone Rate : 5% 

1 Active or 1 Passive Augment Skill

Extra Info

 

Buff 2h.

Special Tatto

Special Armor

Special Weapon

Custom Farm Zones

Augment System

 

Drop Info

 

Special Boss Drop Weapon,Rings and Items.

Custom Mobs Drop Farm Item and BEWS/BEAS and Some LS and Adena

Peace Zone Drop Farm Item

 

 

General Info

 

- Olympiads full retail work. 

- Olympiad period is every week. 

- NPC Buffer duration 2 hours. 

- Clan Hall Active. 

- TVT, CTF, DM. 

- Auto Events every hour. 

- Special Raid Bosses with special drop. 

- Special Farm/Start/Pvp zones 

- Commands: .deposit | .withdraw | .online |

- You have special areas where you can farm !!!

-Special PvP-Pk Color

 

Server Spec's

 

Dualbox Protection 

Anti-Phx Protection 

Protections are based on HWID 

DDoS Protection on Gameserver 

DDoS Protection on Website

DDoS Protection on Server

 

Dedicate Machine 

 

L2 TrapZone is running on a profesional server machine 

1gbps bandwich wich guarantee No Lag 

64 GB DDR

Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 

Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-1620 v2 

 

Server Site: www.l2trapzone.com

Edited by yeniqun
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..