Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I dont understand...

Everyone know that its Stalone project, another serv to make easy €...

 

EVEN IF PEOPLE know it, they ll start to play there, having fun for 1 month.

 

So why you continue to try to "hide" it???

You can tell us its Stalone project, it wont chance anything, but you wont have to create 50 new login on mxc, new paypal account, ...

Its gonna be easier.

Posted

I dont understand...

Everyone know that its Stalone project, another serv to make easy €...

 

EVEN IF PEOPLE know it, they ll start to play there, having fun for 1 month.

 

So why you continue to try to "hide" it???

You can tell us its Stalone project, it wont chance anything, but you wont have to create 50 new login on mxc, new paypal account, ...

Its gonna be easier.

+1 see me in oly.

Posted (edited)

+1 see me in oly.

-1 see me in League of legends where the money i throw end somewhere and i get to play without lamers :)

Edited by Eagle_Eye
Posted

spala-te la pula bai jegosule ca-ti pute gura, and in english means wash ur dick u faking dirty kid because ur mouth stinks.

that makes no sense at all romanias gipsy

Posted (edited)

 

5168 online

 

 

they are inspired at online count as you on tales / conflict

 

x10 maybe more.

 

5168 at prime time and at 4 o"clock at morning 5099

 

 

same as you.

Edited by snshd

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..