Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

so, I want to get walker working for a c5 server, preferably IG when you try to use walker it says filesize error, its an old protection but there is no guide how to bypass it, I tryed to use a clean system folder and edit the token and ip but there is no guide on how to get token from c5 >_< any help?

Posted

you dont need a token for IG. and for the filesize error, you need to make sure your using a c5+ walker.

 

 

and unless you tell us what kind of protection they use, there is nothing we can do to help you.

Posted

what else can I say, I used most of the c5 walkers and I get a filesize error about the token I was saying I tried to take a clean system folder, change the token and port in the clean system folder, change the ip in the l2.ini and I'd have a clean system folder that would connect to my server whitout any protection bullsh1t

in short I wouldnt need the token for the walker but the system folder

and I am not sure how do you call this protection

Posted

maybe you understand in broken english

 

IG no work has filesize error I try all IG no work

make system folder connect to server whit no protection

Posted

there is a way to do so, you can unpack l2walker and patch the filesize error. which is complicated and "illegal". if your serious about this, try looking for a ollydbg script by volx on unpacking ASProtect 2.1x.

 

other than that, if you can patch your system folder manually, i dont think theres anything else that can help you.

Posted

yes that is why I need the token, to patch the system folder manually but I guess that was too hard to understand

tell me what does illegal mean >_< afaik boting is illegal and we still do it :P

Posted

When you get file size error with IG walker, you are using a to old or to new version of walker.

Use the "right" version and you should be able to get it to work... Most C5 servers use 1,78 ( the org one, not the modded one for interlude )

Posted

I tryed and no go

tryed atleast 10 versions from 1.50 to 1.78 >_<

where i can find version 1.67?  can you give link ?

i use 1.78 i have file sizze error  buy when i us 1.79  i can log in but its for IL not c5 but target mobs didnt work ^^

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Thanks FunBasec, I recommend this developer ! He is very friendly and professional.
    • The project is a change to original l2 with modern game mechanics that is more "western". For example every race can craft, not just dwarves. Mages can cast spells without the need of a dedicated box MP charger. MP chargers are also able to solo farm and deal decent damage on their own. Paladins are now 2h sword dedicated healers/support dps. Drop rates are normalized among all classes, no longer needing spoil to craft.   The idea of the project is keep true to the old vanilla classic experience where you are rewarded for effort. And you must put effort into achieving things. Leveling is slow, gear wont be given to you, you must work towards obtaining upgrades. etc.   These are only a small portion of changes I am making to the game. I would love help and bounce design ideas off of others for some future content update ideas. Like can we design unique raid boss encounters? How about end-game content ideas? How can we make owning castles valuable? Maybe an instanced underground mining zone? Or unique raid fights that the clan can do for extra loot?    There's tons of ideas I have and I would like some help creating them.    This is not a paid project. It is a passion project with people who have a passion for l2 and wanna see the community grow.    Currently using client 418. 
    • It requires a lot of research and money to create something that is actually worth having on someones server. But again, even if something worth trying appears,  I dont even trust vanguard at this point, and its even worse if theres some kernel driver signed by a single person without a real company behind it to take the hit if something goes wrong. Thats a huge security risk. Most people are naive and untrained for thinking its okay to elevate permissions for an executable created by someone in their moms basement. The same goes for people who run compiled shared / paid sources and assume its fine, with nothing malicious running inside them.   A user with 13 posts suddenly appears. This is a tech forum, and developers are not here to flex. We are simply discussing the potential risks and reliabilty of the product, since that is the whole purpose of a discussion forum. Otherwise, it becomes no different from marketplaces. In addition, it is  reasonable to question someones capabilities based on their available public data. How do you go from selling web apps to working with such low level concepts that require a lot of specialized knowledge? Think again then before you buy from him with a blind eye.      The first statement contradicts the other one. You say you wont allow anyone access, but youre willing to explicitly run an anti cheat on your computer created by this guy. What exactly is your point?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..