[Share] Java Code LvL 80 SubClass

['Baggos' 118]

Hello guys.

 

With this change in Java Code, when you Add Sub-Class Becoming 80 lvl.

Test & Working at L2J Server.

 

Open the:

net.sf.l2j.gameserver.model.base
------------------------------------------
Line 90
Erase the  "   -   "
and pass the "   +   "
-      private byte _level = 40;
+     private byte _level = 80;

Line 110 
also the same..
-        if (getLevel() == 40)
+        if (getLevel() == 80)

Ready without putting Config.

If you want to Config, go to the following step ...

===================

Now I will show how can the pass to Config.

------------------------------------------
net.sf.l2j.gameserver.model.base
------------------------------------------
Line 20
package net.sf.l2j.gameserver.model.base;
+
+import net.sf.l2j.Config;

Line 97 
-      private long _exp = Experience.LEVEL[40];
+     private long _exp = Experience.LEVEL[Config.SUBCLASS];
Line 108
-      private byte _level = (byte) 40;
+     private byte _level = (byte) Config.SUBCLASS;

-----------------------------------------
net.sf.l2j.config.java
------------------------------------------
Line 487
    /** Death Penalty chance */
    public static int   DEATH_PENALTY_CHANCE;
+
+   /** SubClass Level 80 */
+    public static int   SUBCLASS;

Line 673

                DEATH_PENALTY_CHANCE = Integer.parseInt(otherSettings.getProperty("DeathPenaltyChance", "20"));
+
+                			// SUBCLASS By BaGGoC
+                			SUBCLASS = Integer.parseInt(otherSettings.getProperty("SUBCLASS_LVL_CUSTOM", "40"));

 

The Code Is Ready!

Now Go To..

Java/Config/Other.properties

and put it....

DeathPenaltyChance = 20
+
+#------------------------------------------
+# SUBCLASS By BaGGoC
+#------------------------------------------
+SUBCLASS_LVL_CUSTOM = 40

 

Credits: Me.

[xdem 39]

Read section rules!!! this code is extremely easy, its not a share its a modification to some numbers on the core, and that config is useless because, well i dont need to change the subclass level very often because its a modification that you edit only one time

[penglezos 0]

good job! but better make a patch...

[Kяaσh 0]

Already shared

['Baggos' 118]

Already shared

Yes, but this is better, easier, passing a simple Config and no custom config, more detailed, and 9 in 10 people will pass more easily here rather than that which exists.

I'm wrong?

[Grrysiu 0]

Good share, thx :)