Jump to content
  • 0

[HELP] Castle Control Announce During Siege


Question

Posted

Hello Devs of Maxcheaters,

 

I've came to this topic after a long-term period of trying to solve this problem.

I want when a Clan takes a Castle during siege,to be announced to all players.

Using the method that i've already used to announce when Siege starts,stops & when clan registers for Attack / Defend,i've tryed to use the same code.

 

This is the code:

Announcements.getInstance().announceToAll(""+player.getClan().getName()+" has taken "+getCastle().getName()+" Castle.");

 

This is the error:

errorck.jpg

 

But when using the same code for the other lines,it works perfect.

startg.jpg

endmu.jpg

registerzw.jpg

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

- Revo

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

First you can use this code, it's just cleaner.

 

Announcements.getInstance().announceToAll(player.getClan().getName()+" has taken "+getCastle().getName()+" Castle.");

 

Second, your code can work only if the castle was to another clan. It can't work if the castle was to NPCs.

 

if (getCastle().getOwnerId() > 0) means "if the castle got an owner". You surely made your test on a siege where NPCs were defenders. Your code work, but only on sieges where there is a clan owner, or if someone retake the castle during the siege period (and if only the clan was stored, i'm not even sure it works like that).

 

        if (getIsInProgress()) // Siege still in progress
       {
           // Announce
           Announcements.getInstance().announceToAll(player.getClan().getName()+" has taken "+getCastle().getName()+" Castle.");

           if (getCastle().getOwnerId() > 0) 
           	_siegeGuardManager.removeMercs(); // Remove all merc entry from db

           // If defender doesn't exist (Pc vs Npc) and only 1 attacker

  • 0
Posted

Tryskell,

 

Thanks for your reply & for your cleaner code.

My point is that for the following parts of the siege,the code that i am using works successfully.

 

Siege Start

Siege End

Register Attacker / Defender

 

But when i am trying to make it work for Castle Control,it doesn't accept the code.

player.getClan().getName()

Seems to be invalid but i can't understand the reason.

player

 

The exact code works for all the other lines.

That's what confuses me the most!

 

Thanks in advance,

 

- Revo

  • 0
Posted

Show me a little bit more of this class, whole class (Even if its big, and i suppose it is) put it at pastebin and upload link here.

 

You can't "just create" object of L2PcInstance, because it will return null everywhere (means nothing + NPE error in addition xD)

  • 0
Posted

It's L2Siege.java ,Change Control During Siege Chapter.

Do you still want a pastebin?

 

place it inside the bypass of the npc not inside the l2siege for announcing the registration itself

  • 0
Posted

ohh w8 i see its not like that sorry for that...

 

what you should try is to find the methods addDefender and addAttacker and inside a for loop add the announce  there

 

what i mean is:

for (L2PcInstance player : L2World.getInstance().getAllPlayers().values())

    announce....

  • 0
Posted

I have already fixed the addDefender & addAttacker announce Intrepid.

My problem is that when a Clan takes a Castle,i can't figure out a way to trigger an announcement.

 

Thanks for your replies.

 

- Rev

  • 0
Posted

I have already fixed the addDefender & addAttacker announce Intrepid.

My problem is that when a Clan takes a Castle,i can't figure out a way to trigger an announcement.

 

Thanks for your replies.

 

- Rev

 

ahh sorry again its late here and im slow :D

 

than put the same loop into the endSiege method

  • 0
Posted

I can make the following:

 

Trigger an announcement when siege ends,which Clan controls the Castle.

 

But this is not what i want.

I want to:

 

Trigger an announcement,as soon as the Clan gets the control of the Castle.

  • 0
Posted

I can make the following:

 

Trigger an announcement when siege ends,which Clan controls the Castle.

 

But this is not what i want.

I want to:

 

Trigger an announcement,as soon as the Clan gets the control of the Castle.

 

ahh so when someone take over the artifact not when the siege actually ends right?

  • 0
Posted

Exactly....And this code isn't working. It doesn't recognise the

player

part.

Any way to fix this error?

 

This is the error:

errorck.jpg

 

easy fix to put it in a loop like a said :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Fresh off my private server for inspiration.
    • Custom High Five server L2insolence will open 2026-06-17 21:00 GMT+2 ! ! ! Web: http://www.l2insolence.eu/ Discord: https://discord.gg/duMjnj3y9A We have custom: 10 diferent looking custom armor sets. 8 weapon sets, 2 weapons sets are upgradable. 6 jewel sets. ----------------------------------- All custom tatto, masks, cloaks, agathions, belts, bracelest, talismans and more. Everi single item have own custom stats like: +p.atk% , +m.atk% , +p/m.def% and mutch more. All items in game have own stats. With custom looks. Glowing etc. ----------------------------------- Rates XP, SP: 25x Spoil and Drop: 10x Server Hard Farm ----------------------------------- Enchantment Safe enchant: +20099 Max enchant: +20099 All scrolls: 100% ----------------------------------- You can use scrolls or item enchant NPC to make +++ abd life beter. NPC Buffer There's an NPC buffer in all of our main towns. We have custom self buffs learned with npc with custom stats. Global Gatekeeper. GM Shop with normal items and custom ones, Event NPC, item upgrader NPC. Raid Bosses, every zone have its own boss and drops for rare mats, respawn every 10 seconds.. Olympiad The olympiad is ongoing every two weeks.
    • I agree that kernel-level protection offers much deeper visibility and control, especially when it comes to advanced bots and bypass techniques. That said, I'm not trying to claim that a usermode solution is impossible to bypass. My goal is simply to increase the cost and complexity of bypassing the protection while keeping deployment simple, stable, and compatible for server owners. A lot of Interlude server operators don't want to install kernel drivers or deal with the risks and maintenance that come with them. That's why I'm currently focusing on a layered approach: secure launcher architecture, HWID licensing, session validation, anti-debugging, injection detection, integrity checks, replay protection, and heartbeat monitoring. I'm not ruling out kernel support in the future. Right now, my priority is gathering real-world feedback, improving the product, and learning how people attempt to bypass different protection layers. I appreciate the feedback and the discussion.
    • not true, you can change any bot program name so the ones that are injecting aint a problem any more, you can aswell bypass everything in a dll so his way of thinking isnt bad at all
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..