Jump to content
MaxCheaters Official Group on X
MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord
--> Place your ad text here <--

mcrabben7

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    43

  • Credits

    0 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

  • Feedback

    0%

Trader Feedback

0 0 0

View Feedback

About mcrabben7

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

mcrabben7's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/16)

0

Reputation

  1. mcrabben7
    Admins are not from Supreme (now Azure L2). They have no anti-bot protection. Almost everyone has a working bot there.
  2. mcrabben7
    Supreme isn't offline. www.SupremeL2.org
  3. mcrabben7
    It actually works, if you tried it.
  4. mcrabben7
    Since the source is there, it's easy to bypass the Bake-Ice startup checks. Use your brain and recompile it with a few small changes.
  5. mcrabben7
    There is a working Pet Dupe still out there, and not even Depmax has it fully patched.
  6. mcrabben7
    DepmaX64 does not have any specific anti-bot protections added. I know the guy who made it. Maybe one of the exploit fixes also blocked the bot.
  7. mcrabben7
    ADAL13, if you can see the text WITHOUT changing the packet (ignoring the default L2 encryption) then it's not encrypted. I haven't taken the time to study BakeIce at all, but from what I know, it's does an Auth procedure to let you login, perhaps requests and sends a new auth token, scans your computer for bad programs, and then patches the client Auth connection to let you communicate with the login server. It'd be interesting to see TurkSauron's BakeIce code :P Maybe one of these days I will examine BakeIce under a debugger when I have time ;) It would be an interesting adventure.
  8. mcrabben7
    Wow, they don't even encrypt the server packets. Amateurs.
  9. mcrabben7
    Thank you :)
  10. mcrabben7
    It's a server-side protection engine. You can't exploit a server-side protection engine unless it has a buffer overflow vulnerability, a bug in some of it's code, or doesn't fix a specific exploit. You guys are funny. Fr3DBr works with me, and he's a good guy :P I don't think he made any serious bugs in it.
  11. mcrabben7
    Give credit next time.
  12. mcrabben7
    No. Check out the donations page for information.
  13. mcrabben7
    But it wasn't 18/54, it was different numbers, so I wasn't lying or wrong. You contradict yourself.
  14. mcrabben7
    Meh. The auth token changer was a quickly coded beta system when we went live. We just never cared enough to really do it correctly. We'll implement a new method shortly, though. It will be fun :P
  15. mcrabben7
    It doesn't close valid programs, but ok. If you have a folder named "hlapex zomg close me" it will kill explorer. Also, I'm not a Nazi, but keep being immature. My relatives were killed by the Nazis so it's quite a sad insult.
×
×
  • Create New...