Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You will be so kind to remove this signature?

 

wwwwwm.png

 

i think its against the rules of mods to threat members :)

also makes me feel that my whole effort in this forum is useless.

so it will be kind from you to remove this. thanks

 

Posted

You could PM him, you know. Publicing this so that other members can see "how bad erol is" does not make the situation better.

 

i already said this think about signature once. i made it public in order other members say there opinion free because maybe i was wrong. thats all. i didnt flamed i just asked to remove this

Posted

@ Sofaki: if you link me the other crybaby topic at this section coz of this sig, mabye yes. I'm bored to search. ;D

Posted

@ Sofaki: if you link me the other crybaby topic at this section coz of this sig, mabye yes. I'm bored to search. ;D

 

All moderators must follow strictly Maxcheaters General Rules.

 

Signature images must follow general rules,we also reserve the right to remove any signatures who wilfully violates the forum rules

Posted

All moderators must follow strictly Maxcheaters General Rules.

 

Signature images must follow general rules,we also reserve the right to remove any signatures who wilfully violates the forum rules

yes sure
Posted

i wrote that and it's not against the rules.

 

as i wrote in the end, if you dont like it GTFO

 

 

Oh noes,the snowman is back >.>

Posted

All moderators must follow strictly Maxcheaters General Rules.

 

Signature images must follow general rules,we also reserve the right to remove any signatures who wilfully violates the forum rules

 

what part of it's not against the rules you dont get?

 

dont change your sig erol.

 

Oh noes,the snowman is back >.>

 

i wrote that shit, and it's 150% true, if some kid doesnt like it then he can gtfo, there was another thread just like this one and we explained everything there

 

 

Posted

what part of it's not against the rules you dont get?

 

dont change your sig erol.

 

 

i got it as insult :) and like rules says insulting members doesnt allowed

i read the rules once in the normal way no with insulting singatures.

 

make a signature with the normal rules and then it will be fine

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..