[HELP] FIGHTER PARTY

[PwNNNz0r.^]

It does not matter, just for xp.

actually it does on newer chronicles there are kamaels classes too

[yhn]

actually it does on newer chronicles there are kamaels classes too

and here it comes again, I refuse to play with kamalols, never played/will play.

So for me actually it doesn't matter.

[twinkie]

It does not matter, just for xp.

i'm sorry my friend , but it's a HUGE difference .. for example in archer party in interlude you can go with 4 archers , but in freya i would take out one archer and invite tank , invite one kamael or something

[yhn]

i'm sorry my friend , but it's a HUGE difference .. for example in archer party in interlude you can go with 4 archers , but in freya i would take out one archer and invite tank , invite one kamael or something

tank what for? if you tell me... Replace one of the 4 archers for 1 Warlord, that would be ok.

[twinkie]

tank what for? if you tell me... Replace one of the 4 archers for 1 Warlord, that would be ok.

+5% atk speed , support in pvp

[yhn]

+5% atk speed , support in pvp

keep talking, I still prefer a warlord instead of a tank.

[twinkie]

keep talking, I still prefer a warlord instead of a tank.

For what ? to make trains with bow ? Burst shoot ftw ?

[yhn]

For what ? to make trains with bow ? Burst shoot ftw ?

Do you even know what a warlord is? Stop using stupid arguments to avoid facing facts. On PvE/PvP warloord stuns are pwnage and have mow cost mana... archer just attacks and some stuns.

Anyway, I won't reply anymore.

[twinkie]

Do you even know what a warlord is? Stop using stupid arguments to avoid facing facts. On PvE/PvP warloord stuns are pwnage and have mow cost mana... archer just attacks and some stuns.

Anyway, I won't reply anymore.

Warlord may be better in pvp cause he can run into enemy's and spam stun , but in pve mobs are no problem , so don't need to stun them

[yhn]

Warlord may be better in pvp cause he can run into enemy's and spam stun , but in pve mobs are no problem , so don't need to stun them

So you suggest that Stun is a skill only to be used on players? Dude, wake up!

[twinkie]

So you suggest that Stun is a skill only to be used on players? Dude, wake up!

we are talking about archer party .. so why you need warlord since with archer you farm mobs 1 by 1 and 3 archers can use a stun too ?

If we were talkin' about aoe , then yea .. a warlord would be better

[yhn]

we are talking about archer party .. so why you need warlord since with archer you farm mobs 1 by 1 and 3 archers can use a stun too ?

If we were talkin' about aoe , then yea .. a warlord would be better

but as you can see on the first post, it also asks about pvp. So, unvalid argument.

[twinkie]

Warlord may be better in pvp cause he can run into enemy's and spam stun , but in pve mobs are no problem , so don't need to stun them

Enough with this .. we said our opinions , we spamed enough. I bet that topic owner it's not here anymore , so let's stop it ..

[Dexeryl]

Chronicle not mentioned and it's very important

I suppose this is gf+ chronicle so I would say

WC / BD / SWS / CARDI / EE

TITAN / 2 DAGGER / BERZERKER