Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

answer 1 question, so these 3 ppl should create a collab ? or each of them a different work which results in 3 total ??? :/

There are 3 sigs every team should decide the pros and cons of their members and decide the collabs for every tag

 

GODDESS YOU ARE A JUDGE NOOB :)

Posted

There are 3 sigs every team should decide the pros and cons of their members and decide the collabs for every tag

 

GODDESS YOU ARE A JUDGE NOOB :)

:O whai ;[ ....okay

Posted

:O whai ;[ ....okay

 

because we cant have you in a team with us :S you will make all the tags alone

 

ONTOPIC: THE APPLICATION TIME WILL CLOSE TOMORROW at 5 (17:00) PM

 

I REALLY PLZ THE JUDGES TO CONFRM THAT THEY WILL JUDGE

 

The teams will be anounced at 17:10

 

After that you have to connect with your tesam via msn and make your strategies.

 

After 2 days (Saturday 17:30 pm) Every team should show us their creations

 

The judges have 1 day until Sunday 17:30 to make thei full judgements....

 

Judgements should be in tutorial style and has 3 parts for every theme

 

NOW FOR REWARD I WANT A G.MOD TO CONTACT ME PLZ

Posted

@DS: LOOK THE FIRSST TOPIC OMG

 

@unqART: fu pia

 

@Coyote: Thnx but i really want something for reward like hmm a reward with ps symbol or something like that or a adena amount dunno really

Posted

@DS: LOOK THE FIRSST TOPIC OMG

 

@unqART: fu pia

 

@Coyote: Thnx but i really want something for reward like hmm a reward with ps symbol or something like that or a adena amount dunno really

we can make a banner liek SOTW Winners got in gfx sites or smth.
Posted

well okay...

 

  How many years - 7-6 years nearly

 

  Show us a tag of yours(a creation): yolanda.png

 

  Are you able to work on a team?: Well, not bad in reallife :D

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..