Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was looking for a render from the movie Step Up 3D and I couldn't find one -.-

 

So I thought to cut one on my own..

 

10hkoap.png

 


 

Some parts are bad cut. I tried my best. It ain't easy to cut it with Pen Tool :(

Posted

Bad cut mate :S

Go to layer>Matting>Defride 1px

Also ctrl and click the thumb of the render and then select>inverse and press delete...

Thanks for the Defring option!! :D I didn't knew it!
Posted

well hairs need work but well hair is the most difficult part for every renderer. i can help u via msn if u wish im pro in rendering but i dont cut anymore cause im really bored and lazy atm. was on RF too

Posted

well hairs need work but well hair is the most difficult part for every renderer. i can help u via msn if u wish im pro in rendering but i dont cut anymore cause im really bored and lazy atm. was on RF too

I will add you but not now. I am doing something on Adobe After Effects D:

 

I will post my fail tries here.. First time in AAE..

Posted

You don't need to cut the stuff with pen tool - Polygonal lasso is much more convenient.

Nah.. I used to cut with Polygonal but since I've learn Pen Tool it's much better.
Posted

Nah.. I used to cut with Polygonal but since I've learn Pen Tool it's much better.

I agree, it's just easier.

Tbh i dont cut my renders... I erase the parts i dont like, duplicate and erase with low opacity brushes etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..