Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Okay so I was like reaaally bored, so I've done some pranks myself.

 

Let's see.. Do we remember, THIS guy ?

(Erol did this to him)

21evsq0.png

 

width=960 height=768http://i42.tinypic.com/15p28n9.jpg[/img]

 

Seems pranks keep following him >.>

 

width=960 height=768http://i39.tinypic.com/1zp5d1h.jpg[/img]

 

width=960 height=768http://i43.tinypic.com/20q1cox.jpg[/img]

 

width=960 height=768http://i42.tinypic.com/20kbp5t.jpg[/img]

 

--Epic face---

She had a piggy nose "equiped" but when she saw who was she chatting with , she just :

 

width=960 height=768http://i40.tinypic.com/s658uv.jpg[/img]

 

After 10 seconds, I couldn't bare it and started moking her xD (the conversation continues but couldn't screen it)

 

width=960 height=768http://i42.tinypic.com/10gd9w0.jpg[/img]

Posted

hahaha, you guys really got into this :p i get pms here and in msn asking me for gifs and vids =P

 

I'm glad you liked it 8)

Posted

hahaha, you guys really got into this :p i get pms here and in msn asking me for gifs and vids =P

 

I'm glad you liked it 8)

 

Yeah thanks a lot for sharing this with us dude ! I simply love ManyCam <3

Posted

LOL @ Me getting a group of girls, when they see jonas SCREAM OMG. I wanted to screen it and i confused controls and pressed f12, QQ

 

 

tits or gtfo

Posted

Guys i just DIED LAUGHING!!! I put the "computer geek" video some minutes ago , and when the ugly girl opened her mouth in shock, a guy with his dick appeared and wrote: I know it's shocking, isn't it?? XD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..