Jump to content

[New Tool]L2 Keylogger Project


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for sharing I will w8 for the guide :P

 

PS . I scanned it with online Anti-Virus (again) and with my pc's Anti-Virus nothing found ;) So the file is clean don't worry

Posted

Avast is noob , I have it too and it does not detect anything.

Maybe I will change to another antivirus.

New version with more stuff coming soon.

 

+1.Avira or Kaspersky is leading around here.

Google it for reasons.

Posted

+1.Avira or Kaspersky is leading around here.

Google it for reasons.

 

I know but I want a lightweight antivirus.

 

Edit: Release no2 with secure email connection is released.

Posted

Release no2 with secure email connection is released.

A reverse connection(real time) would just be perfect.
Posted

A reverse connection(real time) would just be perfect.

Its not a rat , therefore it has no meaning coding a reserve connection with the email inbox.

Plus I don't know how to do it. :P

Posted

I have the same problem. Can anyone help us? Thx.

i can`t open l2klstub maybe my i need ot change .NET Framework?

For any questions or help please visit the official forums.

This is not a problem , you shouldn't open l2klstub.Its only used for the build...

You should open only L2 Keylogger and use the options you want and then click the build button.

Posted

after 1 day of sendings emails from virused pc it stoped...

It needs some fixes for now.

I will release a whole new bunch of features in the new version.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..