Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

logoxki.png

Trac:

http://trac6.assembla.com/L2J-Infinity

 

Timeline:

http://trac6.assembla.com/L2J-Infinity/timeline

 

SVN:

http://svn6.assembla.com/svn/L2J-Infinity

 

Forum:

http://l2j-infinity.hostei.com/


Compiled Revisions:

Revision 106 ~> Download <~

Revision 104 ~> Download <~

Revision 91 ~> Download <~

Posted

Hello i dont want spaming but someone can posting what working on this pack. What should work soon etc. Thanks

 

in my opinion is the best pack arround ... i think they dont have fix skills yet

Posted

I see this kind of L2J development, is going good. Although you know, you have to do many things before this back will be ready for a " normal " server, and stop adding shits.

 

Thank you.

Posted

I see this kind of L2J development, is going good. Although you know, you have to do many things before this back will be ready for a " normal " server, and stop adding shits.

 

Thank you.

what u mean stop adding shits? if you are talking about the systems like pvp color or announce castle lord and these kind of things, there is an option in the configs that allow you to choose true or false :)

Posted

what u mean stop adding shits? if you are talking about the systems like pvp color or announce castle lord and these kind of things, there is an option in the configs that allow you to choose true or false :)

 

Yes, and this is shit (customs/another unnecessary configs)

 

First of all they should focus on Retail like things.

Posted

Yes, and this is shit (customs/another unnecessary configs)

 

First of all they should focus on Retail like things.

they are working on these retail things now and they are not unnecessary configs, they are very usefull... its true or false, if you dont want you set it to false, whats the problem? they will be really usefull for people that need these systems in their servers...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..