.
24 members have voted
-
Posts
-
The pack is very good. A lot of private paid packs dont have the optimizations and fixes that L2JMobius has. Take that from someone that considers both Mobius and Galagard, assholes with massive fragile egos. 😉 -
The hate in this topic is just hilarious. The guy is making a client. A client. Not a server pack. A client. A client. And here we have, the owner of the largest open source SERVER pack and the main guy from emudevs, which is also a SERVER pack, hating. Fermata isn't even a competitor for your subscription versions ... Why all that hate ? If he said he's making a handkerchief I think you'd still be here hating.
-
Yes modern interfaces with auto farm and what not, very cool. Not. -
The entire Fermata interface is editable and fully customizable via unencrypted Lua scripts that ship with the client. -
They are loading the geodata as pages handled by OS. Avoiding allocating heap that has both size and CPU overhead. It's abou 300MB less ram usage. That's the first part. The 2nd part is that they have a coarser grid of connected nodes that makes path finding faster compared to the cell based granularity searches. Does it have downsides ? Yes. In closed areas, if there's a gate less than 128 wide, a monster can't pathfind through it and will simply teleport through the wall. But all in all, their CPU saving with this on high loaded servers is very decent. These two feautres of aCis, I believe your pack is lacking, so its a good idea to port them to L2JMobius. Actually L2JMobius geoengine has optimizations that aCis doesn't have. So both packs can borrow ideas from each other to get better. They are both very good packs. You can't go wrong with either of them.
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts