Jump to content

..would you play?  

304 members have voted

  1. 1. ..would you play?

    • Yes,of course 100%!
      122
    • Depends Rates,Staff,L2Pack,Devs etc..
      125
    • No i wont... tell why.
      58


Recommended Posts

Posted

i think 2 servers are enough, one x10 and one x100 or more for pvp. what do you say?

Yes, but not Mid-Rate again, make it 1000x or 500x. Make at last a OFF PVP server !

You guys want a mid rate with buffs only 2nd prof, enchant like retail etc ? Go l2kass.com, l2-renewal.net, l2dismay.com, l2khaos.com and it goes...

 

See ? How many server exists with this style ? Make a PVP server at last, not again mid rate.

Posted

Tbh, I don't really think that many people would play on Interlude x10, nowadays, especially from a new network, that they cannot trust.

 

Hellbound L2OFF would have more chances to succeed as a low rate, imo.

Posted

Yes, but not Mid-Rate again, make it 1000x or 500x. Make at last a OFF PVP server !

You guys want a mid rate with buffs only 2nd prof, enchant like retail etc ? Go l2kass.com, l2-renewal.net, l2dismay.com, l2khaos.com and it goes...

 

See ? How many server exists with this style ? Make a PVP server at last, not again mid rate.

Can't agree more!

Posted

Tbh, I don't really think that many people would play on Interlude x10, nowadays, especially from a new network, that they cannot trust.

 

Hellbound L2OFF would have more chances to succeed as a low rate, imo.

 

nah there are a lot of players searching for this kind of srvr [interlude low..] anw...

Posted

C4/IL OR Hellbound with x100, no customs, just PvP .

Ok, at least make it a " enchating server". Full NPC buffer, not 2nd buffs etc. Make it FULL pvp !

Posted

nah there are a lot of players searching for this kind of srvr [interlude low..] anw...

 

Well, how many Interlude L2OFF low rates exist? 1-2?

 

One that opened kinda recently was L2-Carnage (1st of September if I remember well.) Well, it was a failure. Only 300-400 people in the BEGINING. So, imagine later, when clans would start leaving, cause they didn't get CH or whatever...

 

Compare this to frintezza x10 Hellbound, that opened ~20 days before l2 carnage. 2k+ in the grand opening. Not to mention that Frintezza's already existing Interlude x7 server (~2k daily) was left with 20 people online(Yes, 20 people), and admin was forced to close it, since he didn't want to pay for a dead server.

Posted

Mengz we need something different..There is NO interlude OFF PvPs outa there.So lets make one!A mid rate isn't something new that will attract the gamer..

Yeah right !

 

Imagine a OFF pvp server, where all will be ballance and you fully working. No crazy stats anymore, no 1-2 class in giran. C'mon !

Posted

I don't think 2 servers are good.. you should concentrate on 1 and make it the best... well i think you should leave this poll a couple of days and then create a new one with what rates community wants.This is my opinion anyway.

 

Guys i think a low x10 server for start is enough. But listen to this, we will make a participation form , to whoever is willing playing in a future mxc server, to collect how many people will be in the grand opening 1st day :P. i dont like +1 player every day. why dont we start with 500-1000 members (1st day of opening) who cant wait to register and join? :P

Posted

Guys i think a low x10 server for start is enough. But listen to this, we will make a participation form , to whoever is willing playing in a future mxc server, to collect how many people will be in the grand opening 1st day :P. i dont like +1 player every day. why dont we start with 500-1000 members (1st day of opening) who cant wait to register and join? :P

Make a poll then: "PVP or RPG ?"

It would be nice to start with 400+ in a PVP server too right ?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..