Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

due to this

 

- a problem that you dont like in forum.

 

Let's begin

 

->Section http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?board=37.0

 

the problem is that we have some dead/inactive topics sticky

 

1) http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=58714.0

 

project is inactive timeline is dead no reason to have it sticky.

 

2) http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=46993.0

 

l2 emu timeline link is dead , timeline + Geodata SVN Trunk of l2jfree is dead , Pack Release L2JMatrix link is dead also  l2equal should be added

SVN : http://my-svn.assembla.com/svn/L2J-Equal

Timeline: http://my-trac.assembla.com/L2J-Equal/timeline

Site : http://www.l2equal.lt/

Forum: http://www.l2equal.lt/forum/index.php

 

 

3) http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=6879.0

 

this pack is of 2007 it should get unsticked until mental update it. no security or bug fixes it is too old.

 

 

4) http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=68161.0

 

this one should get sticky i believe it's the only active interlude project

 

 

 

5) http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?board=6.0  <- Section

 

 

why not to make a rule about.

 

Advertisement of server with .ucoz .do.am .tk etc etc is not allowed . reason?

 

Pure example -> http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=74320.0

 

flame + spam if you search at this section you will see that server who has free domain have spam and flames.

 

"server will fail etc" i think it would be better to make a rule like that it will reduce spam and flames and we will have serious servers to look for ::)

Posted

1) true

 

2) both l2emu and l2jf should be updated with their new links.

 

3) agree

 

4) lol their site is not even in english, we shouldn't sticky every new (noob?) team.

 

btw check this

http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=72100.0

 

 

Posted

2) both l2emu and l2jf should be updated with their new links.

 

agree

 

4) lol their site is not even in english, we shouldn't sticky every new (noob?) team.

 

they have english section and it's the only active interlude project.it's better to have archid sticky with dead links?

 

 

Posted

Yes.Exactly im owner of l2jice and none stickied :@.all dead packs are stickied and no ours.Mine and amelie's what to say?does mxc staff care only about themeselves?tell me .. please a mod must take look here !!!

Posted

Yes.Exactly im owner of l2jice and none stickied :@.all dead packs are stickied and no ours.Mine and amelie's what to say?does mxc staff care only about themeselves?tell me .. please a mod must take look here !!!

 

if this is the site of l2jice

 

http://l2jice.freehostia.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=eoacri98eio3iq79oemqh3kpi7&board=12.0

 

it got owned with porn  ::)

Posted

1.agree

2.agree

3.agree

4.lets see what we can do

 

about all the others...we care about themselves only?well maybe yes but maybe not you cant say such a thing to everybody in the mxc stuff few of us yes but most of us dont

Posted

if u search forum u will see all stickys are either from a server of a mxc forum admin,or projects that has beeen created from mxc forum admins(like archid,dot that are tottaly outdated and dead.this is not fair imo.

Posted

http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?board=37.0

 

so what about the current look of the section?

 

I think now it is fine thanks for hte attention

 

BTW for ucoz thingy i think its enough if they mark the topic with it

 

I didn't got it ;p

Posted

I think now it is fine thanks for hte attention

 

I didn't got it ;p

 

mark it like a prefix so you know its ucoz shit or not from the prefix

Posted

mark it like a prefix so you know its ucoz shit or not from the prefix

he means something like  [interlude,l2j,ucoz] in the title,right?

 

It is a good idea in that way people will avoid shitty servers

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..