Augment Passive or active?

[Antikocka]

there are pros and cons which is the better i think passiv skill useful if you got might empower or sometinhg like that but if you get stone hurricane or ect.. thats better ^^

[UltrasGate13™]

i like actives more... :D

[nedox1]

Depends on server - on some servers For example WM Active is for 1 min and reus is quite slow so passive better.

[Nosti21]

i like actives and no passives.

[UltrasGate13™]

i like actives more... :D

 

i changed opinion!! i like more passives like akamanah and zariche!!!!! :D

[Pinaepple]

Actives ofc :D

[Nosti21]

i changed opinion!! i like more passives like akamanah and zariche!!!!! :D

why?? what give that passive?

[Nervos]

i was too liking the Passives for p.atk/atk.speed

but now i like just active ...for the skills

example:

in a server where all skills are make it to be much faster at reuse is Boulder....and its a very powerfull skil for mage

Battle Roar on a fighter that doesn't have it its too something good

and many others

[HighQuality]

of course passive,big amount of stats,no need to wait 5 min reuse

[WeirdSituation]

i prefer passives.

[PASTAL]

passive is better than active cause nobody can see that u have an agu skill except for admin..

[Ioane]

i think actives are better....my oppinion

[curiosul]

pasive on main weapon, active on auxiliar weapons

[iBuG]

Its hard to tell it from me since my favourite classes are archers and bishop. So im prefer both of them. But as extremedwarft said actives are more usefull .

[apos1210]

paaassives :D