Jump to content

[Notabastard] Showcase + Music sig Request [UPDATED 14/3/10]


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

yeah everyone tells me that but i dunno what they mean

 

could you link some useful posts, videos etc? (not forcing, just askin :) )

 

For example this one:

 

5cc1t4.png

 

You used a yellow glow in a red point of your signature..

Generally, don't use too much glow, low the opacity and the glow you use be sure that will be the same color as the text..

Or try to use some cool text ideas, like playing with the fonts, you know what I mean..Rotating one, rotating the other...and try to make something cool..Don't just use the fonts as they are..Change them!!

Posted

I gotta agree with Cyber!You should have decreased the opacity.You see the place that you placed da text has more than one colors(blue,green,red,orange,purple)!To have a nice result you could create a clipping mask or just decrease the opacity.You could also duplicate the text layer and apply a motion blur effect + an outer glow with 25% opacity!

Now if you are pro with Pen Tool you could use it to make something really perfect but I got no suggestions on that!

I am nab sorry xD!

Posted

 

yeah everyone tells me that but i dunno what they mean

 

could you link some useful posts, videos etc? (not forcing, just askin :) )

well do you know where are you going to give effects on text?

i think you now blending options right?

Posted

Well it's quite good but those yellow things should be in lowered opacity AND it's a bit oversmudged,plus the render's not that good effected!

 

their opacity is 60%, and I didn't smudge at all o_O

About the render... jee what more should I add? 3 gradient maps and blending options...

Posted

Oh!My bad sorry!I meant over-sharpened!And about the render those gray/deep purple destroy it really.You could add a motion blur on a duplicated render.Then make another duplication and burn/dodge it where it needs :D

Posted

Just an advice.You don't have to do the Brush (little dots) and put them in soft light for EVERY single signature... :/

 

-Blane

Posted

Just an advice.You don't have to do the Brush (little dots) and put them in soft light for EVERY single signature... :/

 

-Blane

 

I just do it when I feel that the sig is empty

 

in 6 sigs of the main post I dont have the effect

 

I like it tho :)

  • 4 months later...
Posted

Updated 8/3/10

 

You can now request MUSIC sigs

It's not that I can't create other types, but I prefer these.

 

DO NOT spam this topic. I'll have 3 pending requests MAX.

If you post a 4th request , it'll be ignored and deleted.

Posted

Dunno how to request but if you can make me one with jimmy page (when he was young ofc) with txt GrisoM and subtxt Advocatus Diboli. I'll give you a blowjob :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..