Jump to content
  • 0

Exw problha me npc


Question

Posted

Paidia exw katebasei authn thn buffer NPC Buffer By Stefoulis15 kai exei mesa 3 sql arxia 8a ta balw kai ta 3 sthn db?

 

kai sta 3 me bgazei auto to problhma

 

[Err] 1136 - Column count doesn't match value count at row 1

[Msg] Finished - Unsuccessfully

 

ti na kanw?

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Katarxas to provlima einai oti mallon esu exeis l2joneo pack kai theleis na peraseis tin buffer se l2jfree pack..i to antistrofo...Par'ola auta mporeis na kaneis ta eksis:

 

1) Na pareis alli buffer sumvati me to diko sou pack

 

2) Na peraseis ta SQL stin DB sou xeirokinita...

 

 

@OFF TOPIC: Prosexe pou postareis eisai se lathos section

 

 

  • 0
Posted

Katarxas to provlima einai oti mallon esu exeis l2joneo pack kai theleis na peraseis tin buffer se l2jfree pack..i to antistrofo...Par'ola auta mporeis na kaneis ta eksis:

 

1) Na pareis alli buffer sumvati me to diko sou pack

 

2) Na peraseis ta SQL stin DB sou xeirokinita...

 

 

@OFF TOPIC: Prosexe pou postareis eisai se lathos section

 

 

 

apo pou mporo na parw tin simbati buffer gia to pack m? kai 2 pws 8a ta peraso xeirokinita

 

@SOZ

  • 0
Posted

1) Psakse sto forum...Analoga me to pack sou...

 

2) Pigaine Navicat => NPC => Kai kane add oti vlepeis mesa sto SQL tis buffer...Fusika einai me ti seira...

  • 0
Posted

File dn 3erw ti pack exw ena paidi m edose ena site kai katebasa 5-6 arxia ton rotisa ti pack einai kai m eipe pws dn 8ymate mhpws mporo na to brw kapos allios to pack?

kai ama balw auth thn npc buffer opo les xirokinita 8a pai3ei??

  • 0
Posted

An valeis tin buffer xeirokinita vevaiws tha treksei kanonika...arkei na tin valeis swsta...Oson afora to pack sou, mporeis na deis ti pack einai pantou, apla an mporeis steile m se PM to link gia na dw ti akrivws einai...(An kai upopsiazomai tou Killer to pack...)

  • 0
Posted

An valeis tin buffer xeirokinita vevaiws tha treksei kanonika...arkei na tin valeis swsta...Oson afora to pack sou, mporeis na deis ti pack einai pantou, apla an mporeis steile m se PM to link gia na dw ti akrivws einai...(An kai upopsiazomai tou Killer to pack...)

 

File pws 8a thn balw xeirokinhta mhpws mporis na mou thn brei etimi dld na mou breis mia buffer gia to pack m ..?

  • 0
Posted

S eksigisa parapanw...Min ksanakaneis double post kai diavase tous kanones prin postareis kati...

 

@Last Warning

 

File to ekana alla ekei pou leei na balw 40006 mou leei 1062 Duplicate entry 40006 for key 1?

  • 0
Posted

File to ekana alla ekei pou leei na balw 40006 mou leei 1062 Duplicate entry 40006 for key 1?

 

file mou eiparxi eidi stin db afto to ID! to lathos p exeis kani einai oti den exeis vali sto Script.cfg to custom/9999_NPCBufeer/__init__.py an o fakelos sou legete 9999_NPCBuffer! ama den to kanis add eki den sto fortoni

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..