Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

see?  That's my point. People don't want new things. They don't want a better gameplay server. They want the server things. THEY WANT THE OWNERS TO GET ALL THE DONATION MONEY AND CLOSE THE SERVER.

Posted

The question is why y'all keep doing same old shit + new ideas on the same 2 shit clients(interlude/h5)? That's why people are scared of trying to new things. And of course the way how L2 has evolved, if there's no full GM Shop and shitty donations from a 1 month server, people won't play.

I do like the idea and the concept behind it, but there's nothing in the world that can make me play IT/H5 nowadays.

Posted (edited)

 

It looks interesting. However, it's gonna need a ton of testing, which might even prove that it's not a good idea after all. Not sure if it's worth the effort. (Unless you're just enthusiastic about working on something like that...)

Edited by Fortuna
Posted

It looks interesting. However, it's gonna need a ton of testing, which might even prove that it's not a good idea after all. Not sure if it's worth the effort. (Unless you're just enthusiastic about working on something like that...)

It's almost finished and i also had an offer for 2k to sell that on a major server owner that everyone knows but i dont wanna say. Rejected the offer and the project stayed in my repo since then.

Posted (edited)

see?  That's my point. People don't want new things. They don't want a better gameplay server. They want the server things. THEY WANT THE OWNERS TO GET ALL THE DONATION MONEY AND CLOSE THE SERVER.

See what? I do want new things.

 

Quite frankly this is not what I had in mind. 

 

New things are mutually exclusive from a mega-load-ton of new things. Quality over quantity.

I outlined the issue I have with a majority of servers - lack of conflict drivers. 

 

Faction/Event servers have fabricated fights; these drive action, but there is no conflict. The game plays like a sport. This guy is Red, the other is Blue, they fight each other because the event engine says so.

High rate servers have small conflict drivers, but they are old in design - secure farm spot to maximise farming efficiency. But this is short lived - once you get your shit you don't need to secure the spot. That, and the population is too sparsely spread out. And its related to farming, which is obnoxious and inspires maximising 2 different, conflicting builds. One that is good at PvE and another that is good at PvP.

 

And it has the stupid WOW syndrome:

A: "why do you farm this boss?"

B: "so I can get good gear!"

A: "why do you need good gear?"

B: "so I can farm a harder boss!". 

Edited by Epiquin

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • aCis (“another Crappy interlude server”) is a commercial project I would not use even if paid. l2jfrozen yes, a 10 year old, effectively dead project produces more reliable results and at least works. l2jhellas also works. aCis might as well be renamed KPMIS (“Keep Paying My Interlude Server”): endless fixes, freemium, and no realistic path to true L2OFF parity, but its recommended like hell. lucera is even better the downside is you just need to dive into code and no sources   lets leave it at that
    • Download Here: https://sitehunterus.blogspot.com/2025/12/exelo-combo-tool-v2.html VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2acd067847ee092c7986f55c9f77620d89505d1c0bda34a0ee8f55b9c2905c11?nocache=1 Visit my Blogger list to download 100% free software https://www.freetoolss.com/ https://blackhat8.blogspot.com/ https://hack-crack9.blogspot.com/ https://hackernoons.blogspot.com/ https://sharetools99.blogspot.com/
    • Care to detail why ?   L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).   About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).   In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :   Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.   I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.   409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).
    • better than using 409... Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock