Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you'll ever will work on some product, which is used by thousands people - probably you'll understand. Think please from this side - you have a couple of products, you have a tons of clients, and as each software you have some problems, bugs, and perspective development. On which steps you'll have to focus? Obviously that on the most important, isn't it?

 

Cut the crap. For real developer this little bugs is not a problem which can distract from something serious. Especially since you do not sell for 1 euro a product. The mainstream trend in Lineage 2 developing is - create the shit and sell as gold.

Posted

Cut the crap. For real developer this little bugs is not a problem which can distract from something serious. Especially since you do not sell for 1 euro a product. The mainstream trend in Lineage 2 developing is - create the shit and sell as gold.

Thats why I told, that I'm sure that you'll make better, go for it

Posted

I believe this problem with Partycommanderchannel should be on the list of priorities because it is very used.

Do you have any proof links about that? In old cores, like C4 and interlude, MPCC was done for communication purposes only(at least as we know)

Posted

Both extenders are currently under our support. For lowrate - AdvExt is better, as soon as there is 100% fixed scripts with all quests. Just as example - in March with huge success started la2izi on our core, x1 rates with 4000 REAL online(not just drawen on website)

there is no fix on ur fking extender... u just change 1 thing and fuck the whole AI.

about la2izi there is 1500 players online.. not 40000! i am friend with the owners.

 

keys for vang = 1$

find my skype on profile.

Posted

there is no fix on ur fking extender... u just change 1 thing and fuck the whole AI.

about la2izi there is 1500 players online.. not 40000! i am friend with the owners.

 

keys for vang = 1$

find my skype on profile.

you know better, sure. Ok

Posted

Do you have any proof links about that? In old cores, like C4 and interlude, MPCC was done for communication purposes only(at least as we know)

 

i tested in the vangh file and no have this bugg !

 

you invite one pt for command channel and attack  one member for take flag later with other pt use debuff attack or attack aoe, the skill affect the other pt in partychannel ! Test it in you extender and later in vangh file ! u will see !

Posted (edited)

You know what I mean ;)

I don't see any reason why we should discuss for the third time the same situation. Yes it was a bad luck that in this time, when we started to work with you we made a full AI decompilation in sources, and there was misstakes, as soon as another fact - that when you meet in live with AI problems all major fixes was 2 weeks already on SVN, and we replied very fast, and during OBT this problems wasn't found. Also as I don't see any sense to discuss your lie about la2izi online and your friendship with them

 

As all of you can note - we provide 3 day free trial, anyone can download the files and to try to find any bugs there.

Edited by Xeonc
Posted

As far as I can tell, Chaotic zones are meant so you can attack anyone regarding clan/crest. Kills are not counted inside.

This is why 2k17 servers should have pvp zones? You get flagged when you enter and you stay flagged as long as you are inside.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Hi, great work! Are there any bugs? And will it work with a high five?
    • For others that would like to understand in more details:   The login server also uses a protocol (sent by the server to the client in the very first packet). For instance, the C4 client (the one I'm developing my emulator for) expects the protocol number `50721` (or `0xc621`) which works as follow (from what I've gathered): Preamble: L2 packets are divided into two parts: size and payload; As mentioned, every packet starts with two bytes containing the whole packet size (thus including those two bytes, e.g. a packet of size 15 will have the number `15` written onto its first two bytes and a following payload of 13 bytes); For login server, first byte of the payload is the opcode (game server must deal with variable-sized opcodes); Next bytes are the packet content; Before sending the packet, its buffer size (minus the initial two bytes) is padded to 8 bytes (required by upcoming Blowfish encoding); A checksum of the packet is appended at the end, then the payload is again padded to 8 bytes; If the opcode is not `0` (also written as `0x00`), then the payload is encoded by Blowfish; Packet is sent over the network. You can have a look at my implementation (in C++) here (do note I'm assuming little-endian).   In this protocol, the auth packet (`0x00`) sent back by the client is RSA encrypted using the RSA modulus sent in the first server packet, inserted right after the protocol number.  
    • Hello guys I wanna buy some  Lessons for an L2J Developer
    • Let me give you something for inspiration and get you addicted to bot AI     And a siege 😛     What I have notice helps a lot the LLM to act real, is to give it a real-persons background. So for each LLM in the context beggining, besides the L2 facts, give it a real-life back story "You are a 67 years old retired nurse who plays Lineage 2 while her husband reads his newspaper, you are calm, collected but get mad if insulted". But that makes for a creative bot but its repetitive. So what you can also do, is pick random 20 news sites and for each bot every 2-3 days, initialize a context that is affected by the "news" the bot reads in the "real world".  So for example there's Iran - US war ok ? You take the news, put it in an LLM and ask it, extract the "abstract feelings" that this news piece invokes into you without mentioning anything related to the news. Then you take the result and inject it to the bots LLM prompt after its backstory.  This leads to some VERY human-like behavior from bots. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..