Jump to content
  • 0

Look Here, I'm Having A Problem Running A L2Off Server!


Question

Posted

Hello, after lots of time spending on l2j servers, i've decided to try to run and develop(if i'll be capable of) l2off server. Well, to run the server itself was pretty easy, but i don't get how the accounts are created. Firstly, there's no autoreg, as i didn't find any hints on that. Secondly, sql server is not mysql and dbo.user_auth 'password' column has different data type(bytes as i saw in the message)  :lol: . Would somenone mind to tell me how accounts are created or link me to a source of information in which i could find what i'm looking for? :gusta:

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

If you using l2off files its simple accounts can be created by ACP its not same like java servers l2off have not auto create accout system

  • 0
Posted

The C4 packs generally have x_self.sql that creates accounts and adds the server into the dbo.server auth tables.

 

 

So it's simple, add it manually.

If super simple SQL tables scares you that much tho - i'd have to say stop what your doing now and go back to l2j.

  • 0
Posted

The C4 packs generally have x_self.sql that creates accounts and adds the server into the dbo.server auth tables.

 

 

So it's simple, add it manually.

If super simple SQL tables scares you that much tho - i'd have to say stop what your doing now and go back to l2j.

l2j is easy, i want bigger challenges :) Btw, did anyone tried to make/made auto accounts creation for l2off?

  • 0
Posted (edited)

It's not a matter of trying - it's about writing support for it.

 

HAuthD doesn't support it natively, neither does C4\C1 AuthD

 

GF authd supports it natively.

Edited by mcbigmac
  • 0
Posted

It's not a matter of trying - it's about writing support for it.

 

HAuthD doesn't support it natively, neither does C4\C1 AuthD

 

GF authd supports it natively.

It's a good thing that Smeli's server supports C1-GF clients :D

  • 0
Posted

Except smeli's is c1 - and c1 is a mess.

 

Smeli probably made it even more unstable + a myriad of weird ass coding left and right with no structure.

Along with decisions that certain features apparently are "TOTALLY UN L2 ALIKE" and therefor not required to be fixed.

(Which is quite alot of em actually).

 

...but whatever floats your boat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock