Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We will see in OBT time how it works. Frintezza/Zaken is such a pretty badass idea. Old style pvp mode will be nice too. We will see how many people have SSD..

Posted

Nothing failed dumbass, OBT is delayed casue they need few more days to make it compeltly safe and secure.

 

Here is quote from their site:

 

"We are still not ready.

As you already know we lost about 12 days waiting for ovh dedicate server. We already got new one and our work is in progress.

 

To make sure our server will be completely safe from DDoS attack we need few more days. We need another few days to correctly implement Zaken and Frintezza.

 

Summarizing we will not open our server for Open Beta Test until we are 100% sure we are safe, and we are done with our project and features.

And trust me if we would open a server not even prepared for obt, players would not be satisfied and our project would die even faster than it rised.

It’s not hard to set up a server, spend 5k to 10k USD and fail cause of rush or hurrying with the opening.

With my staff we have discussed that we will do the perfect server and we will stay with that thought.

 

During this time we will buy another advertisement banners and we will make sure we reach every lineage 2 player who is interested in our H5p5 OFF files.

 

The estimate time for OBT is 1-5.02.2014

The test should take about 1 week. You will get clear information about that at the end of this month.

 

Stay with us, invite your friends and get ready for more info soon"

 

Few days delay is nothing compared to other big servers back in time. Meanwhile kHRYSTAL go waste your time on other lol/java/stalone/shit servers and stop spreading false rumours.

Posted

its a shitty homemade cheap project, ur website even my sister can make it, pff l2off files my ass, i bet u have some crappy russians files such as l2fandc bought for 25 euros, jajajaj and u lie ppl u have l2off files, fak off tards with ur stupid homemade servers

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..