Jump to content
  • 0

[Question]Acis Source


Question

Posted

Παιδιά κοιτούσα για ένα πακ και βρήκα στο φόρουμ ότι πολλοί αναφέρετε πως το

 

L2j Acis είναι φοβερό πακ..

 

Κάποια στιγμή είπατε ότι έγινε private και για να το αποκτήσεις έπρεπε να δουλέψεις για αυτό

..

Είδα εδώ http://acis.i-live.eu/index.php?topic=1884.0

ότι δίνει το πακ δωρεάν .. είναι το κανονικό πακ του L2j Acis? παρακαλω ενημερώστε με ευχαριστώ

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

κάθε 10 rev νομίζω δίνει 1 rev δωρεάν. δηλαδή είναι 290 στα 300 θα το πάρεις.

 

επίσης, υπάρχουν παλαιότερα source από aCis που είχαν γίνει developed για servers και πουλούθηκαν ή δόθηκαν. (έχω και εγώ 2). εάν θέλεις κάτι παραπάνω κάνε με add στο skype (ianimelegend).

  • 0
Posted

κάθε 10 rev νομίζω δίνει 1 rev δωρεάν. δηλαδή είναι 290 στα 300 θα το πάρεις.

 

επίσης, υπάρχουν παλαιότερα source από aCis που είχαν γίνει developed για servers και πουλούθηκαν ή δόθηκαν. (έχω και εγώ 2). εάν θέλεις κάτι παραπάνω κάνε με add στο skype (ianimelegend).

το datapack νομίζω πως δεν το κάνει share.
  • 0
Posted

mono kai mono na mpeis sto forum na deis pws leitourgei to systima tou acis tha katalaveis ama einai kalo .. mono k mono apo to mualo tou admin!

kai den dinei SVN gia na doulepseis to pack me eclipse oti settings thes na kaneis mono apo to config tou gameserver ama thes thn gnwmh mou trava voitha ton tryskell gia na se voithisei kai aftos

  • 0
Posted

mono kai mono na mpeis sto forum na deis pws leitourgei to systima tou acis tha katalaveis ama einai kalo .. mono k mono apo to mualo tou admin!

kai den dinei SVN gia na doulepseis to pack me eclipse oti settings thes na kaneis mono apo to config tou gameserver ama thes thn gnwmh mou trava voitha ton tryskell gia na se voithisei kai aftos

φίλε, δεν σου έχουν μάθει να μην μιλάς όταν δεν ξέρεις;
  • 0
Posted

δηλαδή για να καταλάβω επειδή το κατέβασα και μπορώ να το περάσω eclipse απλά είναι 10rev πιο πίσω ,δεν υπάρχει πρόβλημα έτσι;

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..