Jump to content
  • 0

[Help] Reward for loose in tvt


Question

Posted

hello i will like to know if someone can make a code for me.

 

I search how can i reward the loose player in tvt same win but for lose i don't find how reward.

 

Thanks you if someone can make it for me

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

My guess would be L2PcInstance.doDie();

	/**
 * Kill the L2Character, Apply Death Penalty, Manage gain/loss Karma and Item Drop.<BR><BR>
 *
 * <B><U> Actions</U> :</B><BR><BR>
 * <li>Reduce the Experience of the L2PcInstance in function of the calculated Death Penalty </li>
 * <li>If necessary, unsummon the Pet of the killed L2PcInstance </li>
 * <li>Manage Karma gain for attacker and Karam loss for the killed L2PcInstance </li>
 * <li>If the killed L2PcInstance has Karma, manage Drop Item</li>
 * <li>Kill the L2PcInstance </li><BR><BR>
 *
 *
 * @param i The HP decrease value
 * @param attacker The L2Character who attacks
 *
 */
@Override
public boolean doDie(L2Character killer)

 

As for the code, I'm not going to do it :c

  • 0
Posted

My guess would be L2PcInstance.doDie();

	/**
 * Kill the L2Character, Apply Death Penalty, Manage gain/loss Karma and Item Drop.<BR><BR>
 *
 * <B><U> Actions</U> :</B><BR><BR>
 * <li>Reduce the Experience of the L2PcInstance in function of the calculated Death Penalty </li>
 * <li>If necessary, unsummon the Pet of the killed L2PcInstance </li>
 * <li>Manage Karma gain for attacker and Karam loss for the killed L2PcInstance </li>
 * <li>If the killed L2PcInstance has Karma, manage Drop Item</li>
 * <li>Kill the L2PcInstance </li><BR><BR>
 *
 *
 * @param i The HP decrease value
 * @param attacker The L2Character who attacks
 *
 */
@Override
public boolean doDie(L2Character killer)

 

As for the code, I'm not going to do it :c

 

I don't understand the difference between Dead and reward the player who lose on a TVT.

  • 0
Posted

Generally, the easiest mean to track something is to rely on "visual" things.

 

By "visual" things, I guess you got a message about victory/defeat. Track those messages and you will go on a method near the good method, if not directly on the good method.

 

You said too the winner earn things. If it's a config (crap), you can track the use of that variable, or even the a-beep-t of reward if it's somewhat unique. If you fall on a mthod who rewards only the winner, then simply create (c/ping) or evolve the current method to reward loser too.

 

PS : why "mou n" from "amou nt" is censored ? Greek insult ? lol

  • 0
Posted

yeh but the problem is i dont find i t... >_<

 

Dude, just do a search for text of the variable name from the config file. You're obviously not doing it right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Download Here: https://sitehunterus.blogspot.com/2025/12/exelo-combo-tool-v2.html VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2acd067847ee092c7986f55c9f77620d89505d1c0bda34a0ee8f55b9c2905c11?nocache=1 Visit my Blogger list to download 100% free software https://www.freetoolss.com/ https://blackhat8.blogspot.com/ https://hack-crack9.blogspot.com/ https://hackernoons.blogspot.com/ https://sharetools99.blogspot.com/
    • Care to detail why ?   L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).   About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).   In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :   Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.   I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.   409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).
    • better than using 409... Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock