PwNNNz0r.^ Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Just to know, there are no more warns for old people here at mxc. You must all know the rules already looooooong time ago. This is the most idiotic thing EVAH! Only because someone is older then other members that doesn't mean he shouldn't be warned before being punished or something. If someone had never done something punishable in the past it's just not fair to punish him w/o even warning him before. All members should receive the same damn treatment, no matter if he's new or old. Whenever someone joins a community, the first thing he should do is reading the rules, so there's no reason the new members shouldn't know the rules and the old ones yes. So being old in a community it's not a reason for being punished at the first rule infringement.
EboLLa Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 If someone had never done something punishable in the past it's just not fair to punish him w/o even warning him before. Very true... because he is very old and never had done something he should get a second chance not be punished without warning...
Reptant_ Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 I am talking to specific people, that have got to all this situation. I got mad with his topic ' I wasn't warned atleast 15 times yet' Do you wanna know what i mean by that? In spam section, 3 people get banned cause of abusing karma/playing with karma. We warn them public, and 'Gregor' (in this case) sees all warns, and all this shit then, he makes an abuse.Are we supposed to warn him again and again? (This is just an example btw) Come real please,it's like saying, 'I have 1 abuse to do till i get punished' (lol..) And dekarma = warn somehow, in this case
Reptant_ Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 And no, we are not supposed to give you 15 warns, before we actually give the lowest punishment..
PwNNNz0r.^ Posted July 20, 2011 Author Posted July 20, 2011 I'm not talking about gregor or anyone in specific, I just quoted your sentence and told that it has no sense, it's totally a bullshit for me. Come real please,it's like saying, 'I have 1 abuse to do till i get punished' (lol..) It also depends on the case, if someone does something really serious and does it on purpose of course he should be punished, but, since you talked about gregor, he even told he didn't realize the topic was in EN because the previous guy posted in gr too, and as he said the other guy didn't got punished and he got punished (dunno if it's true im just giving you an example) Global warnings, like posts in topics, are useless, maybe the guy you wanted to warn with misunderstands and thinks the warn is not for him but for someone else. Better warn via PM And no, we are not supposed to give you 15 warns, before we actually give the lowest punishment.. Did i said that?
Reptant_ Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 We are always following common sense. I dekarma'ed him, cause we have warned all GR people(among with him) thousand times about this thing
PwNNNz0r.^ Posted July 20, 2011 Author Posted July 20, 2011 You still didn't got that I'm not talking about gregor, but about the thing that old members won't be warned before being punished. Because among the old members there are a lot of non-greek members.
Reptant_ Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 jesus dude, think before you post. I was referring to several people, we are not bots dekarma'ing everyone when he breaks the rules.
PwNNNz0r.^ Posted July 20, 2011 Author Posted July 20, 2011 Think before you post too, your sentence can be easily misunderstood. You told you (plural) won't warn people anymore here at MXC, so you were referring to everyone.
Raule Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Dont worry pwnnnzor, you are not old member if you're scared :D
Vazelos Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Actually to be honest, finito is totally right on this.
PwNNNz0r.^ Posted July 20, 2011 Author Posted July 20, 2011 Dont worry pwnnnzor, you are not old member if you're scared :D oh then you can lock it, or maybe not Actually to be honest, finito is totally right on this. then explain me why, 'cause i already explained why this isn't fair
Vazelos Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 A member here from 2009 for example, supposed to know the rules. He don't need a warning in order to get punished for his actions. Warnings are for newcomers.
yhn Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 A member here from 2009 for example, supposed to know the rules. He don't need a warning in order to get punished for his actions. Warnings are for newcomers. At least 1 warning should be done. Anyway...
FighterBoss Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 We are always following common sense. I dekarma'ed him, cause we have warned all GR people(among with him) thousand times about this thing
Recommended Posts