Jump to content
  • 0

[HELP/L2OFF/C6] Vanganth/Kation Extender connect problem


Question

Posted

1. use client revision 744.

 

2. changed server revision 744.

 

3. log in

 

4. I see server list.

 

5. double click server name.

 

6. disconnect from server.

 

7. re log in

 

8. aleady use account.

 

what is wrong?

 

hele me please.

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

;Custom Enter World packet (default off = 0, on = 1)

HashSystem=0

 

[HashSystem]

;Hash Code that will be checked in enterworld packet

HashCode=20cbbcce3a0e712a93bc49018febd7d3

;Check Mac Address at Enter World

CheckMac=0

MaxAllowedClients=2

;Check Client Version in custom packet (0=off any > 0 = version)

ClientVersion=0

  • 0
Posted

744 ? If you check, at the top of ilext.ini there is the protocol version, change it to 744 or check l2server.ini, if your country code is 1

  • 0
Posted

Isn't 744 the "Test" builds of Interlude, and some packets were different comparing to the release when it went live with 746?

 

Or is my memory playing tricks again.

 

 

 

Of course you could also just buy the extender and get direct support from vangyboy.

  • 0
Posted

I have same proplem too, Tried 746 also 744 but same, any solution? May be its because of windows server 2008(new firewall etc)

 

And while trying to log in server, I see this message on l2server window, [usersocket] Unknown protocol 254

  • 0
Posted

I have same proplem too, Tried 746 also 744 but same, any solution? May be its because of windows server 2008(new firewall etc)

 

And while trying to log in server, I see this message on l2server window, [usersocket] Unknown protocol 254

What has to do FIREWALL, with using 7777 port ? If its open there is no problem lol. You want to work with L2Off and you have no clue how to work with windows

  • 0
Posted

Loled, I had only windows server 2008 so I seted it up, well I know ports ofc, But I wondered that may be need a extra conf. for w8

İf u think I have no clue then have a look at my works

 

  • 0
Posted

1,check the Ilext.ini,there is a section named ClientProtection=0,if you dont use ClientEx.dll.set ClientProtection=0...

2,check your L2server.ini ,there is a section named AcceptLowerProtocol=true,if you use lower Client,then set is ture..

3,check the server table in lin2db,ensure that you set it all right...

4,check your client system folder,if you set ClientProtection=0,dont add the ClientEx.dll for your L2.exe...

5,i suggest that you could make a local test.if its all ok,then maybe the problem is firewall or SocketLimiter or another somthing...maybe...i dont knwo too.

...so......

  • 0
Posted

Loled, I had only windows server 2008 so I seted it up, well I know ports ofc, But I wondered that may be need a extra conf. for w8

İf u think I have no clue then have a look at my works

 

He talks about a L2Server.exe error, that is NOT caused by a firewall. Learn about the red messages of L2Server.exe. If FIREWALL would be blocking L2Server, you wont see any message in l2server, cause firewall will block from reaching l2server. And for clientex.dll when i was testing it, and i wasnt using it,with protection active, l2server was showing me a message, "Wrong or Incorrect(cant remember the message) nKey. At least it was for me, when i was testing this ext.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A misaligned badge or a heavy shadow is not evidence of AI. If anything, small inconsistencies are usually proof of years of manual modifications layered over an old codebase. AI-generated UIs tend to be overly clean, symmetrical, and generic because models optimize for visual patterns, not long-term product evolution. What you’re calling “AI design” is actually a very common style in older gaming communities: strong gradients, metallic buttons, glow effects, dense information blocks, and high visual emphasis on rankings/votes/sponsors.    Also, good UI is contextual. A toplist platform for MMORPG servers is optimized differently than a modern SaaS dashboard or a portfolio site. Here, visibility, CTR, sponsor highlighting, fast scanning, and information density matter more than minimalist whitespace trends from Dribbble. And honestly, if the UI was actually generated by AI, it probably would’ve looked more modern and generic — not like a platform that clearly evolved piece by piece over many years 😄   The funny thing is that a lot of these new “AI web designers” can’t even write 20 lines of CSS by hand without ChatGPT holding their hand 😄    They see a shadow, a gradient, or a rounded border and instantly scream “AI-generated” because their entire understanding of design now comes from prompting tools instead of actually building interfaces from scratch. And honestly, @Elfo was right — your own website looks far more AI-generated you built it with Tailwind/shadcn-style aesthetics and probably Next.js ,m i right friend? you built it with Tailwind/shadcn-style aesthetics...  You literally scanned the entire site just to find a tiny shadow behind a button as “proof” 😂 Real developers know the difference between a handcrafted project that evolved over many years, and a generic AI-generated template pumped out in 30 seconds.       Anyway, no hard feelings. Different tastes, different opinions 🙂
    • If it is AI-generated, you used a really shit model. Even AI wouldn't be able to generate obvious errors like the badge misalignment.   I do find it funny, however, that out of everyone to accuse you, Splicho, who used AI to fully generate this https://nimeracp.com/, is the one to talk.
    • You’re free to dislike the design, that’s subjective and totally fine. But calling everything you personally don’t like “AI generated” is not really an argument 😄 The funny part is that the layout constraints you’re criticizing are actually intentional design decisions for toplist platforms — ads, rankings, visibility blocks, sponsor placements, and high information density. This isn’t a portfolio landing page or a SaaS dashboard where you can leave half the screen empty for aesthetics. Also, AI-generated UIs usually look generic, over-animated, inconsistent, and impractical for real long-term usage. Our platform has been evolving for years based on actual user behavior, server owner needs, CTR optimization, and functionality requirements. You may not like the visual style, and that’s okay. But confusing “I don’t like this design” with “this was made by AI” just shows you’re judging emotionally instead of technically. Anyway, appreciate the feedback. Good luck to you too 🙂
    • You don't get it what I am trying to say. Your UI is simply ai generated, entirely. The current theme what you are using. I am not talking about the backend. It's just my personal preference/opinion that I think your UI looks really bad because it's AI generated and whoever worked on it didn't give a single fuck about how it looks, or at least take the time to rework the UI that AI generated yourself.   AI is just bad with design and your website is a proof of concept once again. But how would someone know what looks good and what does not look good if one doesn't have the design skills or knowledge.   Whatever, good luck with your site.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..