Jump to content
  • 0

Interlude skills


Question

Posted

hello guys i need some skills effects for core.please if any1 have it give it to me my pack is last rev l2jserver

 

 

Name: Dodge. ID:446Fixed

Name: Counterattack. ID:447Fixed

Name: Arcane Roar. ID:433Fixed

thx


i have problem with invocation when effect finish the buff don't disapear tell me what i must change fixed

 

thx


when i am attacking the buff dosen't remove what i must change?

thx

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

What kind of effects you mean?

Explain more about it if you're expecting help.

in l2jserver>some effects is missing i  need the effects from

Dodge skill

counterattack skill

and arcana roar

 

i don't know the names of effects

  • 0
Posted

Just ninja them from Freya.

 

- From Freya XMLs, search your skills.

- After that, find the related effect and note it

- Search in Freya core all occurences, tadam you succeed.

 

Dodge and conterattack are easy to implement, about arcana roar i don't get the use, I will tell you when his time to refactor will come :D.

  • 0
Posted

Just ninja them from Freya.

 

- From Freya XMLs, search your skills.

- After that, find the related effect and note it

- Search in Freya core all occurences, tadam you succeed.

 

Dodge and conterattack are easy to implement, about arcana roar i don't get the use, I will tell you when his time to refactor will come :D.

thanks you but i have one other problem

 

i have problem with invocation when effect finish the buff don't disapear tell me what i must change

  • 0
Posted

stopSkillEffects(effect.getSkill().getId());

 

In L2Character, stopImmobileUntilAttacked() method or whatever you called it.

 

The fix I said works if for exemple you're hited by someone, so it should break the effect but your bug continue effect (hp/mp regen) without "visual" meditation effect.

 

Explain better your problem if I miss something.

  • 0
Posted

look when i am use the skill invocation look like this 2yk05qp.png when you do one buff to you, example nobless the buff stuck like this33ois6u.png

 

 


the XML

<skill id="1430" levels="5" name="Invocation">
  <table name="#pDef"> 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 </table>
  <table name="#mpConsume"> 27 28 30 33 34 </table>
  <table name="#Tab-regMp"> 90 100 115 125 140 </table>
  <set name="mpConsume" val="#mpConsume"/>
  <set name="target" val="TARGET_SELF"/>
  <set name="hitTime" val="2000"/>
  <set name="reuseDelay" val="900000"/>
  <set name="skillType" val="BUFF"/>
  <set name="staticReuse" val="true"/>
  <set name="operateType" val="OP_ACTIVE"/>
  <set name="castRange" val="-1"/>
  <set name="effectRange" val="-1"/>
  <set name="negateId" val="1430"/>
  <for>
    <effect count="1" name="ManaHealOverTime" time="30" val="0">
  <add order="0x40" stat="regMp" val="#Tab-regMp"/>
</effect>
<effect count="1" name="Paralyze" time="30" val="0">
<mul order="0x30" stat="pDef" val="0.1" />
    </effect>
  </for>
</skill>

 

Fixed!


but i have  new problem

 

when i am attacking the buff dosen't remove what i must change?

  • 0
Posted

You c/ped Freya Meditation implementation. IL is different.

 

Anyway you missed an "RemovedIfAttacked = True". On Freya it exists, but you have to add it on IL.

 

Another way is to do it differently, because by default you're wrong. On IL, meditation uses the FLOATING_ROOT animation, you're not paralyzed.

 

Check Kamalol or Gracia, perhaps they got the old implementation (using EffectImmobileUntilAttacked effect).

 

You can check my IL project aswell. Why to reinvent the wheel, when someone made it for you...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..