Jump to content

LightFusion

Banned
  • Posts

    686
  • Credits

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by LightFusion

  1. they should try talking with me :-) well I would negotiate it, that's what (~) mark means. Thank you.

     

    You obviously know shit. Please justify the "Another MU Online source" you said. I bet you are just spamming around. And yes, if you are selling every potential bot block method (not crappy winapi hooks) then you can sell it for as much as you want.

    WinApi hooks for bot detecing/blocking,

    6848721.jpg

    thats damn logic...

  2. Hello, this question has been buggin me a lot recently. Personally i started 10 years ago at C3, there were plenty of ppl on various locations, but does anyone know estimated values of online players back then? Was it like 10, 20, 30k or even more?

     

    Greetz

    I dont think there was an limit per players , unreal engine solves easily this kind of issues by giving the player less objects in back view/background and a bit more in front view/around camera position, so more player move in certain location the more objects get rendered, it applies not only to player models, but on objects, effects and all other stuff, i forgott how its called this technique but i was reading about it .

  3. [GR]

     

    3eri kanenas pos mporo na ftia3w parapano skill bar?? se c4?? p.x na exi 2 h 3......attachicon.gifte.png

     

    opos edo???

     

    [EN]

     

    Could you please me know how I can add more skill bars, in C4? for example to have 2 or 3 skill bars like the image

    you cant add them.

     

    Its very hard because its writed in native code, and its hard to understand where are excactly those row bars functionality, but where are just row bars texture&Placement of them.

    For example i did some mods with that skill bar in c4 http://i.imgur.com/H4Kp1qe.png , but in place were i was modifing there is only assign  the texture itself and were to place it, no other functional.

  4. idk what your talking about.

     

    A friend of mine told me that he had to pay extra for some encryption he didn't ask for, and when he said he didn't need any encryption the price changed from 70$ to 120$

     

    lmao

    Your friend doesnt has any moneys to get my product, he wanted to get it in credit, and pay for it after opening - "LMAO",  and noone obliges you to buy the product from me, i make my own rules and my own price, and noone else can take part of it blaming me on how i do my deals, you are acting like a kid who didnt get his candy thats all.

    Other people who use my services were paying me full price that i asked, if you dont like something just dont use it, and you dont have any right on argue about my price politics, you understand that kid ?

  5. by helping i mean lock topics, keep them clean, take care of spam and such.. I don't mean that she was 24/7 active..

     

    She's a kinda new member maybe cause of this and she don't spam so it's not that hard to be a person that you don't know

    Haha, i was locking topics and clean them too, but i was dissmised just because some staffers didnt liked my comments on their action's(thats in reality), now lower staffers moderating my section that acctualy wosnt their main purpouse.

    Just saying how low actual staffers acting....

  6. Just to talk, I don't see this being made because a simple mem hook would be easy reveng and the same $300-500 would hire someone to break w/e protection it is using. Themida/always on crcs checks etc.

     

    If we re hiring a dev and talking about money, L2Off, it would be simpler to just hire someone to make an ext like smelis and add support to more chronicles on the same server imo =p. This way u dont get only widescreen, but better graphics etc.

     

    Modifying the server side is way easier than the client on that aspect (not a simple mem hook to add HOR+ widescreen)

     

    @Sweets

     

    Why would it be useless? Pretty sure widescreen is the norm and IL is popular. Multimonitors/ultra wide are also getting popular. But i understand many didnt even know of this issue playing in 720p/1080p (16:9 - 4:3 isnt so noticeable and zoomhacks make this less of a problem, tho it still sux) (as many dont know when they are playing on a terribly wrong server =p)

     

     

     

     

    Thanks for the replies tho, it was worth a try.

    It worth only hight populated servers who want to attract more attention to unneeded things like that, but if you have enough money  to spend you can allways try to find, who will be doing this.

    And as some persons mentioned here, it could be done not only by .dll hook, but with just simple user.ini editing, or by a bit more complicated .u script editing, that would set this aspect ratio to default value that would look alike 16:9, and wouldt cost less power to do it, but again is it worth it ?

     

  7. I did not say this way an easy fix, if it was I d do it myself.

     

    I thought someone had already done that based on the clients popularity.

     

    Actually a memory hack would fix it - memory hacks fixed a lot of UT games and many other engines - flawlesswidescreen software, widefixer etc. No need to go through all the hassle of d3d etc, tho your method would obviously be more complete. Visit flawlesswidescreen.org for example.

     

    I also dont see a client fix that cant be restricted (HWID etc) sellable/marketable.

     

    I also believe I wont get any help here, but I guess it was worth a try. 10 years would have been enough time for someone to do it if the fix existed.

    if there was a fix i assure you it would be binded(&protected) per server, so you cant use it.

     

    In plus the price for this memory "hack" hook would be pretty bit as i told you its not some minor stuff that anyone can do especialy for that kind of engine.

     

    So the solution for you is only to pay to some developer around 300-500$ or even more, but i still doubt he would make it, cause he would also need to make bind protection, so its not worth it.

  8. Moved to help section, and as long as you think it's an easy fix, that anyone can do, i seriously doubt you gonna get what you want, this is hightly complicated task, that better to be posted in marketsection, but again i doubt you will find someone who will do it, plus the price for this would be just huge over 300-500$ or more, depends on the amount of work, cause you dont seem to realise that what you want to fix is covering d3d direct x, functions, and this  part is very complicated and is hard to understand, you wont get any help here - trust me.

×
×
  • Create New...