Jump to content
  • 0

[Help] About PvP skill reward


Question

Posted

I want to add on some pvp's players to obtain a skill of my choise...for exmple if a player reach 500 pvp to get skill Braveheart etc... how can i make this? :)

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

if (activeChar.getPvpKills() >= 500)

    activeChar.addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(440, 1));

 

add it in EnterWorld.java

  • 0
Posted

after what line should i add this? and if i want more skills 5 or 10 skills same line souldnt there be some other line after 1 skill to add other one? sorry for my bad english and also i dont know about java much ty

  • 0
Posted

if (activeChar.getPvpKills() >= 500)

    activeChar.addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(440, 1));

 

add it in EnterWorld.java

after what line should i add this? and if i want more skills 5 or 10 skills same line souldnt there be some other line after 1 skill to add other one? sorry for my bad english and also i dont know about java much ty

try in EnterWorld.java

loled. Rio try to read the class to understand what means all lines

  • 0
Posted

if (activeChar.getPvpKills() >= 500)

    activeChar.addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(440, 1));

 

add it in EnterWorld.java

^^

 

instead of <= use == its equal.

  • 0
Posted

You can also add it in L2PcInstance.java

At the Public void "increasePvpKills"

and add behind the line with "setPvpKills(getPvpKills() + 1);"

 

if(getPvpKills()== 500)

{

addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(440, 1));

}

 

This way you can also add items as rewards and other things. And its not added again evry time you login like the above example.

(i didnt test this though but it should work)

  • 0
Posted

You can also add it in L2PcInstance.java

At the Public void "increasePvpKills"

and add behind the line with "setPvpKills(getPvpKills() + 1);"

 

This way you can also add items as rewards and other things. And its not added again evry time you login like the above example.

(i didnt test this though but it should work)

The effect will be temporary.

Cannot use equal.

Logically

 

 

  • 0
Posted

I was in testing PcInstance.java, and when I restart I removed the skill.

something else, and I added to give me another 200 next skill to pvp.

and did not work!!

Someone help me?

 

    if(getPvpKills()== 100)
    {
       addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3156, 1));
    }
     if (getPvpKills()== 200)
    {
       addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3157, 1));
    }

  • 0
Posted

@AlexCardyz

Enterworld.java

 

+          if(activeChar.getPvpKills() >= 100)
+	    {
+	       activeChar.addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3156, 1));
+	    }
+	    if (activeChar.getPvpKills() >= 200)
+	    {
+	       activeChar.addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3157, 1));
+	    }

 

L2PcInstance.java

 

            // Add karma to attacker and increase its PK counter
		setPvpKills(getPvpKills() + 1);

+           if(getPvpKills() >= 100)
+	    {
+	       addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3156, 1));
+	    }
+	    if (getPvpKills() >= 200)
+	    {
+	       addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3157, 1));
+	    }

 

I think combining both is the best way.

  • 0
Posted

@AlexCardyz

Enterworld.java

 

+          if(activeChar.getPvpKills() >= 100)
+	    {
+	       activeChar.addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3156, 1));
+	    }
+	    if (activeChar.getPvpKills() >= 200)
+	    {
+	       activeChar.addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3157, 1));
+	    }

 

L2PcInstance.java

 

            // Add karma to attacker and increase its PK counter
		setPvpKills(getPvpKills() + 1);

+           if(getPvpKills() >= 100)
+	    {
+	       addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3156, 1));
+	    }
+	    if (getPvpKills() >= 200)
+	    {
+	       addSkill(SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(3157, 1));
+	    }

 

I think combining both is the best way.

 

Specifically what part would go in the Enterworld.java  ??

:/

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • fixed the flickering , if you noticed to an other specific page please let me know
    • And Discord: https://discord.gg/3aYqWNqb
    • Ofc: https://discord.gg/3aYqWNqb
    • You can find some H5 skins shared in old L2 modding Discords, but most of the higher‑quality ones are either paid or come bundled with full client edits. I usually mix in commissioned work and whatever I can patch myself. On a side note, I fund a lot of these commissions by selling off game items through instant sell cs2 skins, which has been a quick way for me to get some cash for projects.
    • There is no need for gRPC in this case, even tho originally it was gRPC based but since we don't need it to be bi-directional, we switched to simple http requests for the web calls and SSEs for the data streamed from the server. There are distributed locks in place to precent race conditions between actions that can happen between multiple web instances and the server.   Local models can also be slow depending on the model, and most external models can actually be faster than local ones if you use Flash 2.5 or something along those lines. I am running on 512GB of Unified Memory on my Mac Studio M3 Ultra so the speed of the local model for a small model is pretty good but I tested it with Gemini too and it works equally as fast and in some cases faster. The way it works is that I'm using pgvector (one of the benefits of moving to Postgres) to search the data and see what the player can see etc and there is some batching of the next few actions for 2-4 seconds for the user until the next LLM request fires. The batching also includes branching on logic so if they for example fall under some HP they will move to kiting instead of attacking or maybe they heal etc.   Everything is authed and permission-based. The server and the backend of the frontend have secure communication between them, either with a symmetric key (not recommended for production) or a certificate (the recommended way), so there is no worry. It's all tied to the account's access level, etc., so nobody can make an action that they normally wouldn't be allowed to do. Even the MCP is token-based, and there are prompt injection protections in place. The MCP is audited, and every mutation needs confirmation. The admin area is only accessible to the admin account anyway so normal users can't access it.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..