Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

i dont think there´s a fully functional Hero System out there, and all the heroes are manually put by GMs, so if you were to use this i think that the GM would catch it and put some kind of punishment on you.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

i really didnt understand what u meant.your main class is pp but it's not 3rd class and u have soultaker on subclass, and u participate with the soultaker in oli and win fight ? lol u can participate only with main class :D srry but i dont understand :)

Posted

you have to participe 10 times in olympiads (it's the minimum to be hero, and I think you must win atleast 1 fight).

Then when you've done your minimum 10 fights, before the hero attribution, switch in the class in wich you don't have your 3rd job/class(p.s: some ppls have the 3rd class skills, but not the name of this 3rd class cause it wasn't established before...).

 

So in his exemple, at the end you'll compete with the others hierophant but as a PP, if you are the first pp in the list, and if you ask to be hero before the first hierophant does; then you'll be HERO!!!

 

P.S: GM's wont ban you, cause a lot of peoples are doing this cause the 3rd class quests wasn't established when the 3rd class skills were established.

;) njoy

 

Having acumulative subs.. does affects this bug?

  • 4 months later...
Posted

omg ppl stop pretending you did not understand.

make a char with main class Soultaker (3rd class) and a subclass Prophet (2nd class only).

go with the Soultaker to the Oly, fight minimum 10 fights and win at least 1.

change to Prophet after all the matches and you should become hero...i don't know if it works, this is just for the people who did not "understand".

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..