Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

bg_eng-500.thumb.jpg.8290c98e734049c7cb364184b289490b.jpg

 

90% of services have no knowledge in document handling. And even more so in the nuances that your wallet depends on....

Wasting time and nerves trying to find a missing drop?
Blocked account and asked to confirm the origin of funds?
Are you looking for a cheap option and don't want to lose quality of services?


Photoshop services from Mustang Studio

✅ Help with all steps of verification, unlock problematic accounts

✅ Full absence of any traces of graphic editors

✅ Deep analysis of documents using forensics tools

✅ Correct generation of barcodes and exif

✅ Ready accounts and bundles on "live" drops


Our advantages
 

► Simple solutions for non-standard applications

► German printing equipment

► Pay for orders after the work is done

► Discount system for wholesalers and regular customers

► Availability of documents from more than 80 countries

► Reliable partner since 2015


Terms and Conditions*
 

– Mustang Studio is not responsible for access to your services. You must understand that we cannot guarantee 100% pass. You submit all documents at your own risk

– The cost of services depends on the timing, urgency, complexity and volume of work, you can find the pricing policy in the contacts below

– Unpaid orders are made on a first-come, first-served basis. The average time to complete the work is negotiated upon the provision of the terms of reference by the User

– Urgent orders are paid with a surcharge of 50% to 100% depending on the load, complexity and size of the order, production time

– Mustang Studio is not responsible for the content of the work order and materials by the User

– The user is personally responsible for the distribution, placement, use and demonstration of graphic materials

– Refunds are not possible if the User's expectations are not true for this type of service

– Mustang Studio is not responsible for any transactions made without confirming the details of the forum

* Ignorance of the rules does not release the User from liability

* When ordering services, User automatically agree with Mustang Studio rules


Contacts (confirm via forum PM)

◉ Get free consultation and order a drawing right now
 

Telegram @mustang_service (https:// t.me /mustang_service)

 

Jabber (+OTP) mustang@studi0.me (mustang @ studi0. me)


◉ Information channel — https://t.me/+_ui5muqiZqU1ZTgx

#верификация #вериф #редактировать #правка #правки #править #вставка #вставки #PSD #template #CDR #Bank #Statement #Utility #Drops #Bill #verif #verification #proof #employment #paystub #receipt #invoice #tax #forms #payroll #visa #void #Fullz #Selfie #accounts #Casino #Gambling #betting #Crypto #google #amazon #ebay #multiacc #edit #insert #inserts #usa #europe #asia

 

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

39966146.jpg

Mustang Service — not “just another service”

▪ We don’t just redraw documents — we reverse-engineer the system’s logic. And we do it beautifully.

▪ Mustang Service is for when you need more than a quick Photoshop touch-up — you need to pass verification at the edge of the impossible.
When you’re not looking for a template, but ordering a solution for your case.

› What we deliver in practice:

→ deep redraws with no traces of editing
→ an expert approach to verification algorithms
→ guides from people who actually do it — not rehashes of someone else’s manual

▪ With us you get not just a service — you get context.
We show how the system thinks, and how to navigate it.

▪ We work with those who value results, not excuses.
If you’re not with us yet — just take a look at what we publish.

Mustang Service — done right when everything else hasn’t worked.

› TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service )

› Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx )


#redraw #verification #documents #graphics #photoshop #kyc #MustangService

Posted

1.jpg.d392724d82a9cad9574f47e8eaa9f880.jpg

 

9 out of 10 edits fail KYC. And it’s not about a “pretty image”

▪ Mustang Service – when approval matters more than blind testing.

› We work with what systems actually check:

→ passing anti-fraud checkers: Onfido, Veriff, Sumsub, etc.
→ German-grade studio equipment
→ two-stage control + metadata cleaning before submission
→ ELA analysis bypass
→ data structure and logical consistency

▪ While this post is still live – a private bonus is available.

› Message us – we’ll break down your case.

› TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service )
› Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx )

Posted

1.jpg.3465f2ad9fdf2c308b7af7176ca873fc.jpg

 

Back to Full Operating Mode

▪ As of January 16, Mustang Service is back to its regular workflow.

› What this means:
→ we accept both standard and complex cases
→ turnaround times are back to normal
→ no holiday-related limitations

▪ If you postponed a task “until after the holidays” — now is the right time to get back to it.

Message us — we’ll review your case and suggest the optimal way forward.

› TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service )
› Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx )


#drawing #verification #documents #KYC #backtowork

Posted

1.thumb.jpg.13b28ae3bba3fd729220509c27c6d14b.jpg

 

2.thumb.jpg.a6702613597f35fedaadfd7d3ac6785f.jpg

 

Case: medical report edits aligned with KYC logic

▪ The request looked “simple”: replace patient data and adjust values.
In reality, it was a high-risk case where consistency matters more than numbers.

What was done:

→ aligned name, gender, dates, and internal identifiers into a single logic
→ synchronized sample collection time, lab intake, and result print timestamps
→ carefully reduced values without exceeding reference ranges
→ added doctor’s signature and stamp with no repeating patterns
→ delivered the final document as a clean PDF with no editor traces

▪ Critical point:
if you change only values while ignoring timing and service fields,
the document fails on the very first checker.

Conclusion:

Medical reports are read as a system.
Any mismatch in dates, timing, or layout breaks approval.

▪ We work with data logic, not with pictures —
that’s why the result passes verification.

If you have a similar case —
we analyze the risks first, then proceed.

› TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service )
› Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx )


#redraw #verification #documents #KYC #antifraud

Posted

1.jpg.d3c9705ada0801ba6cafa709a27faf8a.jpg

 

2.jpg.1864aaff6e5bb6f808b815302351f1b0.jpg

 

LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”?

▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with.

A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service.
On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review.
“Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here.

› What was done:

→ analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements
→ built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing
→ **completed live verification remotely, without account handover**
→ handled SMS and confirmation codes
→ brought the process to final approval

▪ Result:

→ verification passed
→ access granted
→ no flags or repeat requests

▪ Live verification is not luck.
It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope.

› TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service )
› Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx )


*All data is published with the client’s consent.*
#verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..