Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Greetings! I've seen that Diablo III Section is hidden/deleted... I think that maybe mxc should bring back that section because as i see so far from this game everyone still playing it, Also Diablo III Trades/buying/selling section could be awesome... I Think that this game should be added to our community to have more traffic and interest to post something else except Lineage 2 Contents only.!

 

Much Respects and Love

 

-Vince*

Edited by Vince*
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/9/2021 at 12:37 PM, Vince* said:

Greetings! I've seen that Diablo III Section is hidden/deleted... I think that maybe mxc should bring back that section because as i see so far from this game everyone still playing it, Also Diablo III Trades/buying/selling section could be awesome... I Think that this game should be added to our community to have more traffic and interest to post something else except Lineage 2 Contents only.!

 

Much Respects and Love

 

-Vince*

is there even a way to trade in Diablo 3?

Posted
4 hours ago, BruT said:

is there even a way to trade in Diablo 3?

you can trade only with your party member the items that he/she picked though

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Vince* said:

you can trade only with your party member the items that he/she picked though

yes for 2 hours but whats the point of trading section for a game where trading isnt possible?

Edited by BruT
Posted
On 2/12/2021 at 3:15 PM, BruT said:

yes for 2 hours but whats the point of trading section for a game where trading isnt possible?

Marketplace section can be possible, maybe someone would like to sell their blizzard account for their own reasons each member (MAYBE)

Posted (edited)

the thing is that diablo 3 is already a dead game, ull barely see someone selling his acc just with diablo 3 in, maybe a section for blizzard accounts would be better choise

Edited by BruT
Posted (edited)

there is 1 word for brut: griefer

first he try to say that diablo 3 trades are stupid

after you say he is wrong he wont accept so

he try to say the game is dead

 

here is something so he can argue with google https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=%2Fm%2F04czc9r,%2Fm%2F023ztn,mental hospital for free and grief as much he wants.

 

Edited by iTopZ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..