Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You will need:

 

Unreal Engine 2 Runtime (v22261903)

UTPT, UMODEL or other package extractor. (Optional in this case)

l2encdec

l2fileedit

Photoshop, GIMP or Paint.net

 

And also a bit of knowledge about how things works in L2 clientside.

Posted

overwriting existing start_logo-e with tool would do just fine, no? xd

in case of interlude yes...but on h5? dont you have to recreate the whole font-e.utx?

Posted

in case of interlude yes...but on h5? dont you have to recreate the whole font-e.utx?

 

No as Interlude, you can edit the default L2Font-e.utx 

Posted

You will need:

 

Unreal Engine 2 Runtime (v22261903)

UTPT, UMODEL or other package extractor. (Optional in this case)

l2encdec

l2fileedit

Photoshop, GIMP or Paint.net

 

And also a bit of knowledge about how things works in L2 clientside.

Do you have any link for those tools? 

Posted

overwriting existing start_logo-e with tool would do just fine, no? xd

even with that hows he going to edit the utx without unreal

also thats a REALLY bad way of doing stuff (overwriting retail files) and its much easier (and lighter on patch too!) if he just creates a new one with his texture and edits localization ini to load the new texture instead of from l2uich3/ct1

Posted

even with that hows he going to edit the utx without unreal

also thats a REALLY bad way of doing stuff (overwriting retail files) and its much easier (and lighter on patch too!) if he just creates a new one with his texture and edits localization ini to load the new texture instead of from l2uich3/ct1

He is not going to "edit" utx, just replace its content with l2tool (im just assuming it works on h5 as it does on interlude oops)

Thats true its bad, but we dont know if he wants to create patch for other people or just wants to do a little client modding for his own pleasure. The way he wrote the post makes me think its the latter and in that case i prefer the simplest solutions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..