Jump to content
  • 0

Question

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

By default aCis have scheme buffer which was created by Tryskell, go to the aCis forum, buy customer status, download latest aCis and you will have very good scheme buffer.

Good luck!

  • 0
Posted

first, try to research because i uploaded one maybe a month ago - so there's already working acis buffer right in this section (probably second page). everything what you need can be found there - nothing more, nothing less.

  • 0
Posted

By default aCis have scheme buffer which was created by Tryskell, go to the aCis forum, buy customer status, download latest aCis and you will have very good scheme buffer.

Good luck!

is not created by Tryskell i have this buffer 3 year ( author  House ) is first version 

 

Tryskell update this buffer

 

bat is verry bad buffer no see name of buff , song ....

  • 0
Posted (edited)

By default aCis have scheme buffer which was created by Tryskell, go to the aCis forum, buy customer status, download latest aCis and you will have very good scheme buffer.

Good luck!

 

[Request] Server Dev Help [L2J]

 

 The "Tryskell" buffer is Old as hell -.- its not simple just lame design.....

+1 to "Pirama" for No name in buffs.

 

and please stop ask for "Buy" Customer... we are not on Marketplace.

 

//Edit

 

About topic... if you want private work .... "special" buffer for only your server... i think you have to pay...

else i can pref you : http://www.maxcheaters.com/topic/181807-npc-buffer-scheme-r1n4s/

Edited by T9Text
  • 0
Posted (edited)

The "Tryskell" buffer is Old as hell -.-

 

else i can pref you : http://www.maxcheaters.com/topic/181807-npc-buffer-scheme-r1n4s/

Do you know that your post has no sense at all? How Tks buffer can be "old as hell", while it's REWORKED buffer which is OLD & BUGGED, which you "pref"? What I want to say is.. It's the same buffer.. Tryskell reworked and fixed it, so how can it be old as hell and how the hell can you recommend that old & bugged buffer? ^_^

 

Think before you talk. No names? Rework it. You cant? Pay someone to do it or create a help topic. Simple as that. You guys want to reinvent the wheel.

Edited by SweeTs
  • 0
Posted

Do you know that your post has no sense at all? How Tks buffer can be "old as hell", while it's REWORKED buffer which is OLD & BUGGED, which you "pref"? What I want to say is.. It's the same buffer.. Tryskell reworked and fixed it, so how can it be old as hell and how the hell can you recommend that old & bugged buffer? ^_^

 

Think before you talk. No names? Rework it. You cant? Pay someone to do it or create a help topic. Simple as that. You guys want to reinvent the wheel.

I send him one free share buffer for acis... if he have Zero skill to edit / fix it... its not my problem... then he have to buy the instance / sql  (files)

any way the "Defaul" buffer is rly... simple and without names. So i dont pref to him.

  • 0
Posted

Do you know that your post has no sense at all? How Tks buffer can be "old as hell", while it's REWORKED buffer which is OLD & BUGGED, which you "pref"? What I want to say is.. It's the same buffer.. Tryskell reworked and fixed it, so how can it be old as hell and how the hell can you recommend that old & bugged buffer? ^_^

 

Think before you talk. No names? Rework it. You cant? Pay someone to do it or create a help topic. Simple as that. You guys want to reinvent the wheel.

bro see this

 

/**
 * This class stores players' buff schemes into _schemesTable.
 * @author House, Tryskell
 */
 
Tryskell said allon author House and Tryskell fix smoll bug ( i use this buffer more year before )  full fixed and no have more bag
SeewTs bro stop cry plz .
and now i ask you : i Have acis 345 version and i update it so much .... tell me now : name of pack is L2j acis or L2j pirama ?
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Here are my thoughts. Full clan of bots ,and multiple bots in parties ...not my cup of tea , but I admire the vision . However I do see a more scaled down version of this . Like a mercenary system . The party leader can recruit just 1 mercenary from a certain NPC . This mercenary can be any class you or your party needs . But I would focus on supports , they are needed the most and no one really wants to play them. 
    • One thing you should keep in mind is that bot parties however good AI you have, will never be able to defeat player parties. If an organized clan comes with 3 9-man real player parties, they can steamroll 3 parties of bots with 1-2 players inside.    So bot AI parties can contest uncontested Bosses, but not contested bosses like Baium/Valakas that the top clans always chase. But as I said, I believe its a very good idea, most developers don't have creativity to think these things, they make CMS and downloaders and client guards. The community is lacking creativity and this will bring it back I believe.    And ofcurse its a very difficult project, as you will see step by step. So all in all mad respect at you, this is a huge mountain to climb.
    • I would say the main idea for me would be to solve problems of regular servers, not to make these bots pretend they are real people.  Time wasted looking for parties is solvable with this.  Timegated playing a big requirement by big clans that ask you to be 10h online if you want to have end game experience is also solvable with this.  I think they should not try to replace real players completely, they should just be an option for smooth gameplay, a tool to remove friction and open posibilities for a solo or small party players, that still want to experience epic bosses, mass pvp and sieges. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..