- 0
Request Ai Error
-
Posts
-
By NeoPacket0041 · Posted
LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case -
IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:
-
This is a bump: https://databay.com/
-
i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5 --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server --->this one for HB client?im not sure... so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem? 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!
-
Topics

Question
caganitas
Hi,
im trying to do something in AI and i keep getting erros in the NPC server as soon as AI is loaded, as if the ai.obj gets corrupted, its a huge stack(after compiling it to .obj and adding the compiled code) if i use the s0 variable but if i remove that variable and use hardcoded strings it works, this code is simple i just want to test something where i manage a string every time MENU_SELECTED is invoked.
What i expected this code to do was basically the NPC would say the string "l2Bbuffer002.htm". (no sense i know, but i cut the code to figure what was corrupting it)
The NASC code
class 1 buffer : default_npc
{
parameter:
string fnHi = "l2Bbuffer001.htm";
string page = "l2Bbuffer001.htm";
handler:
EventHandler TALKED(talker) {
myself::ShowPage(talker,fnHi);
return;
}
EventHandler MENU_SELECTED(ask,reply,item,action_id,s0) {
Edited by caganitass0 = "l2Bbuffer002.htm";
myself::Say(s0);
return;
}//event
}//class
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts