Jump to content
  • 0

Question About Npcpos File And Geodata/maps


Question

Posted

2 basic and somewhat newbie questions:

 

a) Any noticeable difference between npcpos and npcpos_real? I mean, I can compare the files and see differences, but did anyone figure out which file should I use? (L2devs has both - wonder if they real is the old one, and the other is the "fixed/improved" version of it)

 

b) The game has some areas where my chars "fall" inside the ground. I see some "space" between blocks of land and I fall on those and begin swimming. if I reconnect, I'm back on land. It's mostly noticeable in the windymill area, near gludin. Client or server related? I'd say client, but wanted to be sure, because if it was geodata I'd try to modify and fix it.

 

Related to b, did the "euro" files (rpggrp? Forgot it's name) touch the geodata at all or is it the same as the leaked version?

 

bonus: anyone remembers a website that shows which "block of land" in the maps folder relates to what area in-game( 11_23, 11_24 etc) or some other method? I plan on testing other clients specific maps to see if they all have this error/issue.

 

Ty

 

 

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

...if you can compare the files you can see the differences - and then logicly deduce the difference -_-

 

 

It's possible that since GF was claimed to be a "PTS" leak not - a live leak that geodata is not quite "100%".

I'd get HDGE and try fix it.

Most errors with geo from retail close to chronicle are small cell errors that everyone can fix.

 

your google fu sucks:

 

http://www.lineage2.gigarent.it/mappat2.jpg

 

http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/1215/mapc6wo9.jpg

 

http://la2service.com/i/geodata_map_hellbound.jpg

  • 0
Posted

My google fu sucked indeed, didnt think of adding geodata to the search, shame on me. I was about to try l2walker maps or smt like it. Should have looked harder - wont ask for help again w smt so trivial

 

I compared the 2 files in text w bad eyes - not in game, just wondered which would be better in the end. (God im tired of comparing files lol) i better check in game and dataparse the differences decently like for synthax.

 

Gonna fix the geo.

 

Thank you, solved.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..