Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
 

Trusted , Polite , Cheap. I just exchanged 85 eurs paysafe for 70'50 paypal

 

He asked all my questions with pacience. and explained me very well about how he doing , what % of money he keep , paypal keep. etc

 

In fact i think i will do exchanges only with him.

 

 

x3ykvp6esx6lhozlxk5.jpg

Thanks, I appreciate the Print screen very much!
I hope to see you around next time! Don't forget your vouched transaction!

Edited by grstaycool
Posted

Really good guy!!! Fast and polite  i did more than 100 euro trades with him!!!

Trusted till death :)

 

 

 

Once again fast trades  

 

and really trusted guy!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

we just trade 50 euro psc to paypal!!

 

 

BUMP ;)

 

You are my best buyer so far! Thank you!

Posted

You have only one guy doing replies about your "trusted" services...

Not so good yet...I would try your services but i won't for the moment due to low vouches...that could easily be a friend..

So good luck.

Posted

You have only one guy doing replies about your "trusted" services...

Not so good yet...I would try your services but i won't for the moment due to low vouches...that could easily be a friend..

So good luck.

Well there are other 3 people who trade with me so far( 1 was banned i don't know why) you can ask them both: Maxtop, madocter. Today i traded with bilias and maxtop. Feel free to ask them. Also i can send you my paypal payments in PM, if you like! I hope you vouch for me some day :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..