Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wouldnt ever join to a stalone+mouse project and yes eoa is their project. L2tales and vadc is their project too, another srv only for donate

 

is not my server :O :O ^/^

Posted

l2tales l2eoa l2suckmyballs are "projects" of the same stupid and corrupted people, using the same shitty server files...you have to be nuts to participate in such parody of l2 server

Posted

stalone is making on forum fake clan that recruiting ppl lol xD u think if u will post that few fake clans will come u will get more ppl ? Next time read before u copy infos from clan coz as u see:

 

I know you, ladies and gentleman exactly know WHO WE ARE. Nonetheless, I'd like to introduce us to those who haven't heard about us yet and announce our great comeback.

We are the Best of the Best from last two RPG servers x5 and x15 rate. After dominating L2.ws lately, it's the high time to begin the new part of our flawless history.


We have top parties from Genocide, Addiction, BandOfBobs, OOC and with us are our old buddies from Exodus, Sorrow, Swarm and all kind of Russian zergs.
We are forming a server side to playarrow-10x10.png and to win with the help of aYotech, Genocide power rangers, the Shortpants squad from azure, Raziel the 15 times hero and AwakenDemon from OOC.

Good luck and "privet" to everyone on upcoming Innova server. You stand no chance.

 

 

 

called fail xD

Posted

i'm old gm of tales  so anyone should know,...   l2tales were made by me  stalone and mouse :)  so they expelled me cause they are so 'pro' and now they open together EOA Too :P   they still using my platform even on eoa... damn  kids

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..