Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ηello,

This is the voting thread of the second SOTM, themed as "Anime" !

In here, you'll be able to vote for the best tags of the contest.You can vote only for 3 users........

Let's move on the entries...

 

9cf79dc1d8.png

 


PARTICIPANTS & TAGS


 

 

 

Name:

UnSponsored

 

Tag

3jk79iv.png

 


 

Name:

Tijseh

 

border_zpsf7c1e318.png

 


 

Name:

Dask

 

Tag

MRcnZXw.png

 


 

Name:

^Wyatt

 

f5ae30274b.gif

 


 

Name:

`iAndre

 

Tag

tX1pRPl.png

 


 

Name:

vad

 

Tag

DeahnotemqeG.png

 


 

Name:

Zardanico

 

Tag

Soft7.png

 


 

Name:

Stewie

 

Tag

xN8RsKL.png

 


 

Name:

[AntiHerO]

 

Tag

sotm_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.png

 


 

Name:

xDamian

 

Tag

ninja_sotm_sig.png

 


 

Name:

Soula

 

Tag

4OTAsFJ.jpg

 

 


HOW TO VOTE ?


 

(!) Important: You can vote up to 3 tags, please follow the form bellow:

 

[b]First Vote[/b] [i](reason)[/i][b]: [/b][b][color=white]Name[/color][/b]
[b]Second Vote[/b] [i](reason)[/i][b]: [/b][b][color=white]Name[/color][/b]
[b]Third Vote[/b] [i](reason)[/i][b]: [/b][b][color=white]Name[/color][/b]

 

Note: The participants cant vote for themselves.

 

Informations:

 

Note that it doesn't matter who you'll vote for first/second/third. The winner will be the one with the most votes.

No comments on the tags are allowed. Any violation of the rules will cause punishments.

If you dont give a reason for the voting then your voting won't be counted.

Thanks.

 

 


VOTING RUNNING TIME


 

 

START DATE: 1.09.2013 - END DATE: 10.09.2013

 

 

 

Posted

Changes inside competition.

 

1. Voting theard it's changed, the gfx moderators will chose the winners.

2. My participation will be canceled.

3. The winners will be announced untill the midnight.

 

Note: More informations about the updates will come when SOTM #7 will take over.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..