Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

 

My team want to start a new Interlude project, we have 3 different working packs : high rate pvp, mid rate, and Faction style ( GvE )

 

I want your opinions; what would you guys prefer for a serious project.

 

Thx in advance

Posted

personally i think GvE is not a bad idea, especially since there aren't many ( non good ) at the moment.

 

Our GvE will be based on the usual faction style map changing but with custom enchant system based on pvps instead of scrolls.

 

What do you guys think about this : every 50 kills with a weapon get you +1 on that weapon, until +12. After that you have to buy Scrolls ( expensive ) to get it to +16 ( chance around 50% ) if enchant fails, the wepans goes back to +12.

 

Please feel free to suggest anything, the server is made for the players, so help make it good

Posted

personally i think GvE is not a bad idea, especially since there aren't many ( non good ) at the moment.

 

Our GvE will be based on the usual faction style map changing but with custom enchant system based on pvps instead of scrolls.

 

What do you guys think about this : every 50 kills with a weapon get you +1 on that weapon, until +12. After that you have to buy Scrolls ( expensive ) to get it to +16 ( chance around 50% ) if enchant fails, the wepans goes back to +12.

 

Please feel free to suggest anything, the server is made for the players, so help make it good

 

make it every 20 kills you may have the chance to have your weapon echanted. The chance should be like 40%

Posted

make it every 20 kills you may have the chance to have your weapon echanted. The chance should be like 40%

 

That's interesting. The website should be up today or tomorrow, we will do a poll.

 

Please guys continue with your suggestions, thank you.

Posted

Yeah and even add announcement maybe or Hero glow for kill streaks ( no hero skills ofc )

 

if not hero skills.. maybe.. hmm.. hero coins or something like this

 

i.e every 5 hero coins you receive free hero for 24 hours + additional stats of some hp,p.def,etc.

 

To make it better ;D so people can fight for something that worths so much work!

Posted

if not hero skills.. maybe.. hmm.. hero coins or something like this

 

i.e every 5 hero coins you receive free hero for 24 hours + additional stats of some hp,p.def,etc.

 

To make it better ;D so people can fight for something that worths so much work!

 

Im not sure about the ++ in stats but we'll make a poll and see, the website and beta server should be in up in 2 days

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..