Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought mods not allowed to participate in their own events :D

was there such rule?

Anyway..I didn't participate on this one 'coz there have already been many rages ongoing.

It's not that fun for me or mix to organize things but just be watching them, you know.

Posted

I will say my opinion because none have the balls to do so.

 

I respect every member that participated on the event but the main theme was BLACK & WHITE!

Any colorful image, even a single splash of any color besides black and white had to be banned from the competition. The results wasn't fair for the other competitors.

Posted

Lawl..

There is a difference between saying that a tag is THEMED black n white, or the colors SHOULD BE ONLY black n white.

end of story.

I allowed them to use colors, just not overdoing it.

 

Posted

I will say my opinion because none have the balls to do so.

 

I respect every member that participated on the event but the main theme was BLACK & WHITE!

Any colorful image, even a single splash of any color besides black and white had to be banned from the competition. The results wasn't fair for the other competitors.

Yeah, I told B&W... so I made myself an winner special signature  :D

Lawl..

There is a difference between saying that a tag is THEMED black n white, or the colors SHOULD BE ONLY black n white.

end of story.

I allowed them to use colors, just not overdoing it.

Still, Black and White... means black and white, nothing more.

Posted

Ok, let's get this straight.

I don't really care if you agree. I set that rule and it's on.

Does it matter if I'd write the theme in a different way? Fkn NO!

Wait for the next one, if this is what caused your loss.

Posted

Ok, let's get this straight.

I don't really care if you agree. I set that rule and it's on.

Does it matter if I'd write the theme in a different way? Fkn NO!

Wait for the next one, if this is what caused your loss.

You do not need to swear. Anyway, I was telling that when you make an contest you need to put STRICT rules, not that you write in topic black & white and at the end of the contest you say... well... warm colors allowed too a bit. That's not how contests work, anyway, I got my prize:

lolgux.png

:P

Posted

I will say my opinion because none have the balls to do so.

 

I respect every member that participated on the event but the main theme was BLACK & WHITE!

Any colorful image, even a single splash of any color besides black and white had to be banned from the competition. The results wasn't fair for the other competitors.

and this too

 

i wont take a part in next SOTM

Posted

and this too

 

i wont take a part in next SOTM

 

Except if they will make S.O.T.M with colouring and not B & W as it was this one....

Posted

and this too

 

i wont take a part in next SOTM

you know the story 'bout the carebears, right?

 

Well, guys, we bring activity here.

You can appreciate it, or not. It's not our problem.

There will be much more events than sotm.

I've planned the next one already.

Posted

you know the story 'bout the carebears, right?

 

Well, guys, we bring activity here.

You can appreciate it, or not. It's not our problem.

There will be much more events than sotm.

I've planned the next one already.

 

Good Luck with Next one Then MD... I wish that it will be unique in GFX..

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..