Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

1. it`s not my server

2. i like the server how it is, but i hate people who lie about it and you are a mega lier ! Server is very balanced and nice chance at skills if you don`t know to play don`t revenge on server ! this is my thinking ! Good Luck to find your server ! BB

i was not talking to ya retard and when did i atk the server and said its unbalanced? dont type when u r on drugs ...what a fag(i said its not poppulated and that i dont like  and yea i will find a better server,gtfo)

 

@mend yea doesnt matter u didnt get it

Posted

selfowned? anyway server is dead and sucky :S

 

Cause no one posts the ballance issues and the bugs on forum. That would fix those problems faster. But what can we do... those are the players in our days crying,spamming,insulting on server, almost no one posted anything on forum.

Posted

Cause no one posts the ballance issues and the bugs on forum. That would fix those problems faster. But what can we do... those are the players in our days crying,spamming,insulting on server, almost no one posted anything on forum.

 

well no offense man, but last time I tried to make an account on the forums I had like 10 tries after i quit trying cause of the RETARDED verification image...which is unreadable...and u have to click 10000 times till u get a decent one...

Posted

Srsly? Or are you just kidding?

If not, you just made my day.

666 is satan's number in case you dont know. Maybe, that's one of the reasons you don't have many people.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..