[Project]L2JFree: Genesis

[32start]

there are many things that need to be reworked on l2j and that things can't be reworked because if you want to change something, you need to change many things in other classes.

so, new l2jfree is, in fact, a big rework.

anyway, i wish team good luck and inspiration, provide us a good stable and unique pack. let there be three platforms - l2jserver, l2dream and brand new l2jfree genesis.

[MELERIX]

7 years since L2 Emulation started, and there is still people fighting for: ¿ who have the penis more big ?

 

seriously guys, wtf!

 

L2J, L2JFree and any other Fork "IS GREAT", if the project follow the spirit of L2J Emulation, Free Software & Open Source.

[etherian]

 

 

wannabe...

[ArkeyWave]

7 years since L2 Emulation started, and there is still people fighting for: ¿ who have the penis more big ?

 

seriously guys, wtf!

 

L2J, L2JFree and any other Fork "IS GREAT", if the project follow the spirit of L2J Emulation, Free Software & Open Source.

If the l2j team wouldnt suck so hard we would not have forks and we would still have 1 big team and a great pack why you cant understand that one?

[etherian]

 

still wannabe...

[Mestro]

7 years since L2 Emulation started, and there is still people fighting for: ¿ who have the penis more big ?

 

seriously guys, wtf!

 

L2J, L2JFree and any other Fork "IS GREAT", if the project follow the spirit of L2J Emulation, Free Software & Open Source.

 

Sorry man thats not about penis thats just about the fact that we cant work with l2j because everyone stucked with it.

 

And about open source...says the team who went for a while to releases which is not so open source? :)

[Mestro]

 

Thx man

 

spammer...

[MELERIX]

If the l2j team wouldnt suck so hard we would not have forks and we would still have 1 big team and a great pack why you cant understand that one?

 

I understand everything, thats why I'm not against forks ;)

 

Forks are necessary in Open-Source Projects to get different ideas, as you can see most of the Open-Source projects have Forks, and Linux is not an exception :P

 

Forks born from human nature, due all humans think different, and have differents ways to follow life or development ways ;)

 

Sorry man thats not about penis thats just about the fact that we cant work with l2j because everyone stucked with it.

 

And about open source...says the team who went for a while to releases which is not so open source? :)

 

and L2J was not Open-Source ? :o

[Mestro]

I understand everything, thats why I'm not against forks ;)

 

Forks are necessary in Open-Source Projects to get different ideas, as you can see most of the Open-Source projects have Forks, and Linux is not an exception :P

 

Forks born from human nature, due all humans think different, and have differents ways to follow life or development ways ;)

 

and L2J was not Open-Source ? :o

 

Nono i said l2j was a weird open source thing with the releases ONLY because of the reason of extremly stupid leadership,huge ego,money...

 

While i laughed my ass off when i seen the letter to the forks i was sadly disappointed that a team thats here for such a long time can switch to that level of stupidity.

 

And you are right forks are necessary but do they worthy for anything?i dont think so most of them are worse than the original source, and as far as l2jfree well we will be a new emulator not a fork so... :)

[MELERIX]

that "letter to the forks" you mentioned, I remember was created (for the bad forks), because some of these forks started to no respect the GPL lisence, and some of them started to just copy code from others but removing the credits from the original author, and related things.

[Mestro]

that "letter to the forks" you mentioned, I remember was created (for the bad forks), because some of these forks started to no respect the GPL lisence, and some of them started to just copy code from others but removing the credits from the original author, and related things.

 

come on l2j have the most leeched code still :)

[MELERIX]

where ? who ? Oo

[Mestro]

globalvariables = worse version of l2jfree persistent properties

rnd = bad copy of l2jfree rnd

l2itemtype = l2jfree abstractl2itemtype

 

not even mentioning the mapregion which is so similar to the l2jfree mapregion system :D

 

Its open source its fine but come on atleast dont pretend l2j is the good boy :D

[MELERIX]

lol, the new mapregion was made from scrath, based on retail structure/system ;)

 

the old one (from tables) no idea because I joined on L2J (2006/2007) when it was already done :P

 

others things taken from L2JFree are already with his credits just take a look, for example:

 

http://trac.l2jserver.com/search?q=l2jfree&noquickjump=1&changeset=on

http://trac.l2jserver.com/search?q=nbali&noquickjump=1&changeset=on

[Malzahax]

MELERIX is right , l2j is the creator of such a golden thing... It gives you the opportunity to explore the game...

 

As i know l2j files are only to make tests and explore how the game is thats why is legal.

 

So about features etc i think you dont need to fight because i believe the law is broken, if i am right correct me...

 

 

Anyway i will still support l2j for this work of years and ok l2jfree is good too and will be "even better than l2j" but you shouldnt insult their work Maestro...

 

And about the New Emulator thingie... Since is java coded wont be a new emulator ... Why? Because you will clean the source and make a <<MEGA - Refactor?>> ..

 

Anyway i am out of this... just try to help each other instead of creating and fighting who was the best penis on e-net