mage or archer ?

[kadius]

I think bow is better.

Mages has low p.def :D

[kaguyakun]

Hm necro/summoner do a nice job in 1vs1/farming.. if you knows a friend buffer better :)

 

Necro/summoner can own cata.. (aa/scroll of ancient of magic)

Necro/summoner can own GC/Toi mostly of times (selling recs or even crafting if you has spoiler)

Necro/summoner are kinda nice in pvp.. just 1 thing is needed.. skills of player :)(It's not only nuke+nuke+nuke) :D

[Zigfrid]

full buffed archer party > full buffed mage party

 

archer is very nice for mass pvps,

mages are better to play alone ( best for this is ol/ee if your server has mutants)

[deinemudda91]

Best is The Dreadhnought (Warlord) I think, you go in Imperial Graveyard or Four Sepulchres an make Provoke in 3 Rooms , you kill them in 30 sekonds If you are good bufft and have a good pole

[Aster]

if u know how to play a mage MAGE >ALL

on the other side archer is to simple (only hit+stun+spamm CP pots and again)

remember archer>mage  PRO ARCHER<PRO MAGE

but i rec to u take dagger!

dagger>alls even tanks on normal servers (coz of lethal xD)

but again its all up to u

[Koyuki]

mages critical damage is way bigger than archers , not to mention they cast faster

 

with the right buffs a mages party can critical for 30% , and thats a lot

mages have bad pdef, its true

but archers has bad mdef too