Jump to content

mcbigmac

Members
  • Posts

    1,245
  • Credits

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by mcbigmac

  1. And the reason you'll never learn.

     

     

     

    You asked, you got an  answer.

     

    And you made a retarded comeback instead of searching for the product, or more guidance.

     

     

    Fucks sake even so called "pro's" rely on others framework.

    bah, for you and everyone else.

     

     

    Knowledge will die and those of us from the "old days" will continue to have ever increasing field days.

  2. Everything is chained up to handlers in AI, in the deeper classes.

    teleport_Request calls teleport request handler which by standard loads the first teleport list defined by string name.

     

    just as the ask&reply id for nobless, calls menu_select and can then cause actions based on the checks of ask & reply.

     

     

    If you don't want to learn AI or even small mods... then don't run a server.

    Seriously arrogance galore.

     

    Better yet, set it up and point me to it.

    I'll take care of it.

     

  3. Oh boy.. lets hope i don't spam this time!

     

    1.

    Learn AI/NASC, look at master classes for teleporters.

    The main "Teleporter" class for example doesn't support more than 2(3) standard teleports - predefined link wise..

    Look thru AI.

     

    Youll have to map up AI with HTML accordingly.

     

    Ill have to actually recheck the standard practice before i'll comment further.

    May do that later.

     

    2.

    They have they're own html parser.

    Actually can't remember,  has to be possible tho...

     

    Isn't this more 'Nice to have' than 'need to have'?

     

    Find a server with colours in htmls, leech from packets.

    problem solved.

     

     

    3.

    It's predefined and preset in castledata.txt in the bottom - sort of.

    Don't try specific days, c4 doesn't actually support that.

    Never bothered much with this, since SSQ dusk rewards amongst others needs to coincide timewise to work.

    Olympiad/SSQ/Castle Siege, in my oppinion mind you, aren't very... "flexible" without sprewing some side effect.

    Without hooking them directly inside l2server.

     

     

    4.

    No idea wth your on about.

    Shouldn't set_castle_owner work with the AGIT identify wether, id or name.

    Youll have to prop up more info.

     

    Alternatively, kill cached, set up ownership in database, remove auction time in database.

    Boot up.

     

    5.

    Limitations defined by extensions added to l2server.

    learn to read all ini's of the "packs" your using.

    And check if the item is sellable at all in the first place.

  4. Thanks. But will the oly knows the keep on making cycles? I mean if i set it for today,and the terms are 1 weeks. will it restart it 1 week and start second period?

     

     

    Olympiad is possibly the most conservatively written system in all of l2server.

    While it's been a while, i'd say anyone who's wanted new schedules (and they're continued success) so haven't had much luck just by commands / editing Olympiad tables.

     

    I seem to recall tendencies to screw up cycles and 24 hour matches.

    You should test tho and report back.

  5. bla.bla.bla.

     

    Sorry, but that's how i see your reply.

    Either you know nothing about enviroments, and just barely can setup an l2off server or your ignoring my words.

    I think the latter tho (Oh look i'm not assuming shit!).

    Now also learn, that i'm still not talking about pyro, and the incident.

     

    I hope you know what packets are, and the different communications options that server daemons of l2off offer.

    Now imagine a bad port/and or a daemon was allowed publicy due to a server move.

     

    Lets imagine some of those packets contain strings, to be executed into a MSSQL daemon.

    And oh, lets think they're unchecked(And they are by c4 default) cause there not meant to be public.

     

    What would happen with a cmd shell ? ;)

    Can you figure that out?

     

    Of course it doesn't even have to come that far, if those packets themselves can do something interesting ingame.

     

    However, what you don't know is how dVampire protects you from the scenario above cause.

    And lots of other things it does, and doesn't protect you from.

     

    You don't know this, cause you just plug'n'play - like scarily large majority does today when making l2off.

    And therein lies problems when you defend your ego cause you wanted to do some l2off, and now shit happens to the other.

    And everything turns into a big piss contest, about who can piss the longest and assume the most.

     

    Yet for some reason every single player accepts it and listens to you(No, not you personally).

     

     

    I hope you'll make another server :)

  6. Embass, yes i do have my own project.

    I'm by no means an expert, but i did put time into it, managed to learn a thing or two about how things work.

    And it's by no means an easy feat dVamp and Kvoxi have done - i've been wanting to best them for a long time.

     

    If you knew the "l2off" scene (Kind of sarcastic to call it that, but still) - you'd know.

     

     

    And how the fuck do you think depmAx64 works, dumbass?

    Does fr3d have access to both la2guard and dvampire sources - that would be news to me.

    You research it, map it and build over it.

     

    For the cmd part:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175046.aspx - do read.

     

    What do you think makes you secure against this? your setup?

    Your lucky dvamp has protection against execution, inside his cached detecting the input strings in Cached packets.

    Lets face it... 99% use SA as a SQL user - probably even you did.

    Therefor a cmdshell ironicly has alot to do with it, if it's setup badly -  cause then what can you do with a little cmdshell ? ;)

     

    But goodjob showing your intelligence, by starting off with such a display of linguistics.

    Oh yes, let's hope for tons more l2off "distributions", so you can keep making servers to feed your ego's.

  7. plus

     

    The only good IL L2OFF with average 1k community and live is L2MXC

     

     

    Some of you are braindead clearly.

     

    L2mxc, L2Vendetta, L2Sublimity, L2Dismay and many other populated servers.

    We all use the same DLL.

     

    Which means. We all have the same friggin security.

    If Neither of the above servers got hacked, how come Vendetta "magically" did?

     

    There was no hack. Char was given away. If there WAS a hack, other IL dvamp L2off servers would be abused long ago.

     

    P.s. Awaiting l2mxc to fail as well. Life span of a new L2server is 4 months tops. L2mxc is no exception.

    Maybe if they used different files other than dvamp. But they don't.

    Look at their uptime. Server crashes at least once a day. They CANNOT do anything about that. It is how dvamp is like.

    The more people you have online, the more often it will crash.

     

    Says who?

     

     

    You and a million other wannabes use dVampire and La2guard/nextdev.

     

    You never learn shit about the actual c4 server.

     

    most of you can barely script proper, not to mention write ai or nasc.

     

     

     

    Enlighten me how someone with no knowledge or research of the extender in question or executable/program, can possibly claim there's no "hacks" present.

    You now idea of knowing what mistakes lies in c4, dvamp or intentional loopholes.

    And more importantly, if someone bothered why should he share anything to anyone?

     

    (And no, this is not defence of pyro).

     

     

     

     

    No one bothers to learn in l2off anymore, not even basic things.

    Bad setups can allow direct shell and root access, wether your dvamp, c4 or nextdev.

     

    All it takes is 1 mistake.

     

×
×
  • Create New...