Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well what did u thought ? ha i could of just simply started wpe pro and look for the packets containing the keys xD but u gave me an idea.. each 5 bytes segments to get a key..

 

Anyway u can protect ur code fairly easy u can chose to spend some cash on a good obfuscator or get to compile with ur own specific algorithm or binary compilation and so on.

 

Also alot of ppl lack knowledge to bypass such a thing specially lineage 2.. if it was world of warcraft however the story would of been different :P

 

Depending on stupidity is a very very bad programming practice.

 

Okay, so you use public key to encrypt client -> server and server -> client packets. Yet if you want (and yes, you have no choice) to decrypt received packets, the client/launcher still has to have the private key. That means anyone can stumble upon it and start injecting packets and doing other bs on your server.

 

Also, if you are thinking that assembly programmers are rare nowadays: think again.

Posted

To capture a bot like that, bot has to be on default configuration. Any small change in behaviour will result undetectable bot. And those who make bots arent stupid, so it ain't gona work.

Posted

MxC Forum IQ just did skyrock :D..

 

interesting Idea, did understand it mostly. i was amazed what kind of people actually trolling this forum ;). hope i can Compete in the future ..

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Really interesting research...My diploma thesis was in Neural Networks of Kohonen (Self Organizing Maps) and i am really surprised to see a use of them in Lineage2.We could use neural networks with supervised learning so we set a standard of what we expect from our program-algorithm to make for us.For example we can set as a standard the time that a particular skill is been used and if our neural algorithm-program finds out that this skill is been used mathematically every X seconds and for X repeats but with the absolute same time, then the player automatically disconnects and gets an IP ban.The neural network as it is trained and gives feedback it becomes better and better with the time...

Posted

Really interesting research...My diploma thesis was in Neural Networks of Kohonen (Self Organizing Maps) and i am really surprised to see a use of them in Lineage2.We could use neural networks with supervised learning so we set a standard of what we expect from our program-algorithm to make for us.For example we can set as a standard the time that a particular skill is been used and if our neural algorithm-program finds out that this skill is been used mathematically every X seconds and for X repeats but with the absolute same time, then the player automatically disconnects and gets an IP ban.The neural network as it is trained and gives feedback it becomes better and better with the time...

 

You can setup from l2walker or l2net what skills you want to be used first or last any player setup differents skills... so its useless... also if the character is archer? or even he dont use skills only atack?

 

The only thing you can do is to secure your java part... is not 100% secured but at last you have some...

Posted
for sure u wont have any success here on mxc with a topic of such content simply becouse this community is retarded(kids and really stupid ppl) what u feed them, they will eat.

 

That true, mxch is a kid place, that you are a kid-stiuped-mch member is true too... that we are all nabs here is true...

-------------------

 

im really suprized with this one... (Mr "i know all")

 

And for detecting bots.. wouldn't it be simpler  to make an launcher killing processes and communicating with xor encrypted packets? or simply look for specific bot behaviors in packets?

 

 

there is nothing to say about it.... it says all.. ^^....

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..