Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Gratz asshole you are officialy a ripper.  >:(

 

So I knew IntrigueX was a ripper and I was searching for the evidence.

So i present these details :

 

His sig:

2qw3luw.jpg

 

Ripped sig :

fnzoev.jpg

 

PS : Gratz IntrigueX you destroyed the signature with ur topaz!

When you try rip sth please at least do it correctly. ;)

Posted

Uh...Darky, it's actually the same signature with topaz... Unless he was the creator of the untopazzed one, he is a ripper.

Posted

aww ur blind too arent u ?. 348kbol.jpg cant u see the major details? they arent even close to the same signature . jeez.

 

Believe me it is ripped.

If you read the tut u will understand.

anyway he added something small for sure

Posted

are u both blind? cant u see? the leafes up there are bigged than the second 1.  the tree on the first 1 is bigger than the second 1.and the second 1 got some lines wich 1st 1 doesnt.

Posted

Believe me it is ripped.

If you read the tut u will understand.

anyway he added something small for sure

 

Where was the gfx'ers.

Shame!

Just a another ripper.

Posted

Gratz asshole you are officialy a ripper.  >:(

 

So I knew IntrigueX was a ripper and I was searching for the evidence.

So i present these details :

 

His sig:

2qw3luw.jpg

 

Ripped sig :

fnzoev.jpg

 

PS : Gratz IntrigueX you destroyed the signature with ur topaz!

When you try rip sth please at least do it correctly. ;)

so you are a fucking looser. what a pitty you didnt proove anything.Cry me a river
Posted

The signature isn't ripped, since there are numerous differences between them such as the render's size, the borders, the trees, the lighting, etc.

When you try to prove sth please at least do it correctly. ;)

Edited.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...