Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

9/10,

I gave not 10/10 because I don't really like the smoke (On the right bottom),

And work on text a little longer.

And everything else is good, I guess ?

This is just my opinion, btw.

Posted

9/10,

I gave not 10/10 because I don't really like the smoke (On the right bottom),

And work on text a little longer.

And everything else is good, I guess ?

This is just my opinion, btw.

smoke? or stroke ? i cant add good stoke :P
Posted

Smoke, I guess ... ?

At the bottom of the right,

Where the text is,

Little more to the right and little more to the bottom.

thats the render smudged :P

 

Edit: Btw nice signature. Happy to see ppl improving from the guide of Sofaki and we all should thx her. Btw i will download it later and try out to make a sign too. ^^

Posted

i dont say something different xristo...

but imagine this forum with 30 gfxers for example

and the 25 of them using smudge etc....

whats the point?

 

smudge is gfx right?

u dont like smudge? close ur eyes :D or press the red button on the top-right of ur window :D

 

that u are saying are words from less than newbie...

 

did i ever said

Hey this is my secret COPY ME!!!

i dont have any prob of copy my style

aww and btw pro.... THIS IS NOT SMUDGE

Posted

smudge is gfx right?

u dont like smudge? close ur eyes :D or press the red button on the top-right of ur window :D

 

that u are saying are words from less than newbie...

 

did i ever said

Hey this is my secret COPY ME!!!

i dont have any prob of copy my style

aww and btw pro.... THIS IS NOT SMUDGE

 

how you started the sig?

with stock? :S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..